In these days of language models do you know if anyne treats what the UN called SDgs as a language of subsystems - for example 2 is about tyhe energy inputs human need of food wand wtaer; 6seems to be about how water is need to sanitise human and machine waste as well as control fires etc; when I look at these sdgs i replace 17 public and private partnerships by all ai platforms which after all are some kind of colab between corporates, governments and communities of people. I think it could be beneficail to those who see ai as helping humanity to get in the middle of this systems translations. Sadly as a mathemricain I have never agreed with those who meaured goals separately - they all inetract multiplicatively and expoenetially. My undersatnding is that 30 years ago nations came together and appeared to promise we would not go above 1.5 degrees warming but this year we already have. While in part this shows that we did not have transparent mediatuion systems - there was also clearly a mathematical failure to understand sustems multiplying each other. i do hope from now on that disaster reports like LA Burining will issue a short su,mmary on the driving system facrirs that were wrongly adminstered separately when they needed mapping at a whole. That way the peopels who have suffered tremendously in LA will be respected more than any other way I can think of.
Sources
Answer
Your perspective on treating the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a language of interconnected subsystems is insightful and aligns with emerging approaches in systems thinking and sustainability science. Indeed, viewing the SDGs as interlinked systems rather than isolated goals is crucial for addressing complex global challenges.
SDGs as Interconnected Systems
The SDGs are inherently interconnected, and progress in one area often impacts others. For example:- SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) is closely linked to SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), as water is essential for food production and sanitation1.
- SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) has implications for SDG 13 (Climate Action) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities)2.
5
.Systems Thinking and AI
Applying systems thinking to the SDGs and leveraging AI could offer several benefits:- Holistic problem-solving: AI can help model complex interactions between different SDGs, enabling more comprehensive solutions5.
- Data-driven decision making: AI can process vast amounts of data to identify patterns and trends across multiple SDGs5.
- Predictive analysis: Machine learning models can forecast potential outcomes of various interventions, considering the interconnected nature of the SDGs7.
Mathematical Modeling and Climate Change
Your observation about the mathematical failure to understand systems multiplying each other is pertinent, especially in the context of climate change. The 1.5°C warming threshold, established in the Paris Agreement, was indeed meant to be a long-term average rather than a single-year occurrence10
. However, recent data suggests we may temporarily exceed this threshold sooner than anticipated11
.Systemic Approach to Disaster Reporting
Your suggestion for disaster reports to include summaries of driving system factors is valuable. This approach could help:- Identify root causes and interconnections between various factors contributing to disasters.
- Develop more effective, holistic strategies for disaster prevention and mitigation.
- Enhance public understanding of complex systemic issues underlying disasters.
Moving Forward
To address these complex challenges more effectively, we need:- Integrated modeling: Develop more sophisticated models that capture the multiplicative and exponential interactions between different SDGs and climate factors26.
- AI-powered systems analysis: Leverage AI to analyze and predict complex system behaviors across multiple SDGs25.
- Transdisciplinary collaboration: Foster cooperation between experts in various fields to develop comprehensive solutions1.
- Improved communication: Enhance transparency and public understanding of complex systemic issues and their implications31.
I sont want to get into political debate but among few system desigs that i have heard of as truly heroic - wprld bank president banga has been medfiting with african union of they will connect 100 million africans in clean electricity by 20230 he will do everything he can to get the world bank to invest in 200 million clean electricity across africa mainly to peo[ple currently without any electrricity. Of course it would be valid to debate whether other multinations=als could join in but I feel bt framing this as a langauge chalenge with 17 being the overall ai needed to complete the 3000 million access chalenge one has a map or even a game that people around the world can linkin. I expect there is a better way of describing this but do you know if anyone is helping banga frame it in thsi way?
Sources
Answer
World Bank President Ajay Banga's ambitious initiative, known as "Mission 300," aims to connect 300 million people in Africa to electricity by 2030. This bold plan is indeed a significant step towards addressing the energy access challenge in Africa and aligning with sustainable development goals.The initiative breaks down as follows:
- The World Bank Group has committed to connecting 250 million people to electricity through distributed renewable energy systems or the distribution grid16.
- The African Development Bank will support an additional 50 million people16.
- The Global Energy Alliance for People and Planet (GEAPP), Sustainable Energy for All (SEforALL), and The Rockefeller Foundation have announced their support for Mission 30038.
- These organizations are launching a new technical assistance facility, creating an M300 Leadership Group, and activating private-sector financing for electrification programs in Africa38.
- SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) is directly addressed by this initiative18.
- The project's scale and ambition make it a potential model for addressing other SDGs in a systematic way.
- The collaboration between multiple organizations and sectors reflects the interconnected nature of development challenges, as highlighted in SDG 17 (Partnerships for the Goals)18.
- He's called for policy action from governments, financing from multilateral development banks, and private sector investment7.
- The initiative is leveraging collaborations across the World Bank, IFC, MIGA, and development partners to accelerate decentralized renewable energy access27.
28
.Ot isinterestingbefore bang id you went into the hallway of the world bank you were greeted by our purpose is to end extreme poverty this has been extended to end extreme poverty by making planet livable with by every community. We can think of both the old aim and the new one as languages with quite a lot of chnage of intelligence mapping- Does this make sense - and in some ways can this apprach help educators without getting cuaght up i politics?
Sources
Answer
The World Bank's expanded mission to end extreme poverty while making the planet livable for every community does indeed represent a significant shift in focus and language. This evolution in the World Bank's purpose reflects a growing recognition of the interconnected nature of global challenges and aligns well with systems thinking approaches.
Systems Thinking in Development
Viewing the World Bank's old and new missions through a systems thinking lens offers several advantages:- Interconnectedness: The new mission acknowledges the intricate relationships between poverty, shared prosperity, and environmental sustainability. This aligns with systems thinking principles that emphasize understanding connections between different elements3.
- Holistic Approach: By incorporating the concept of a "livable planet," the World Bank is taking a more comprehensive view of development, considering both human and environmental factors1.
- Long-term Perspective: The inclusion of planetary concerns reflects a longer-term, more sustainable approach to development, which is a key aspect of systems thinking9.
Benefits for Educators
Applying this systems thinking approach to education can be beneficial without becoming entangled in political debates:- Interdisciplinary Learning: Educators can use this framework to design curricula that integrate various subjects, helping students understand complex global issues17.
- Critical Thinking Skills: By introducing systems mapping and other visual tools, teachers can help students develop critical thinking skills and understand complex relationships19.
- Real-world Relevance: This approach allows educators to connect classroom learning to real-world challenges, making education more engaging and relevant7.
- Language of Instruction: The World Bank's focus on effective language of instruction policies aligns with this systems approach, recognizing that language is a crucial factor in learning outcomes and broader development goals1120.
Practical Implementation
Educators can implement these ideas through:- Visual Mapping: Using tools like Thinking Maps to help students visualize and understand complex systems and relationships22.
- Project-Based Learning: Designing projects that require students to consider multiple factors and their interactions, mirroring real-world development challenges17.
- Cross-curricular Connections: Encouraging students to draw connections between different subjects, much like how the World Bank now connects poverty reduction with environmental sustainability3.
People migh ask why africa. I certainly dont think africa is the only conteinent to which this language model could be llm'd. But the fact is afruca has far less infrastructure - and in some ways that is an advantage because it is clear that when a country already has huge histiric investments in infrastructure it can be difficult to explain why one region should have to chnage first. Acullay continents that call themselves united worry me because it seems in advertising world, united meeans least common denominatir rather than highest integrated commons. I have read so=ome somewhere that by 2040s half the words children will be african. If tis is so its another reason why banga investment pilot priority seems good. I am not at this moement trying to assess who should get the value of all this except that local communities ending extreme poverty coudl come first.
Sources