Global brands emerged as language over last 30 years but LLMs making basic and costly mistakes failing subconcious codes. Ask for example chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

Over 50 years ago at The Economist dad Norman debated main purposes of satellites - pity human intelligence has not done this. "Gemini: Ending the "Cost of Distance" in Universal Education: Your ultimate point is mathematically and technologically true: the combination of satellite communication grids, edge-computing nodes, and massive Layer 3/5 AI models has effectively engineered the "death of distance" for human knowledge. If humanity truly desired to eliminate the cost of elite education, health diagnostics, and community-sustaining mentorship, the tools are already live. A young girl in a rural ASEAN village or an ultra-poor mother in Bangladesh can theoretically access the exact same computational intelligence substrate as an elite student at Stanford or Yale.

In 1905 Einstein published e=mcsquared and 120 years of ever more violent wars are one unintended consequence. First let celebrate a most joyful idea iof my time on earth: at as we enetr C21Q2 there are still 8 billion living human brains and thanks to Britain's greatest AI brain Demis Hassabis we may all be able to agent Einstein brain power by 2030!
Join AIWHitehouse ...Minimum AI Brief to all teachers ;;Day 366 Trump2.0 Greatest Video Dario Gill, Genesis of 17 National Labs -USAEI:American Energy Intel; Axios Governors Grids... DC March 11 scsp .ai+education summit & ... May 7 15000 delegate AI+expo
Don't be fooled - AI are 100 years away from being smarter than humans- see world AI models

What if greatest risk to future of American and worldwide brainpower is not transforming education in the 60 years (1965-2025) since moores law, jensen law, 1g to 6g designed machines with billion times more maths brain power than separate human minds and hierarchical top-down department silos including professors and doctoral students let alone k-12 societal literacy mediating digital and real life's Health*Wealth*Trust: how your time and data is spent not just money. Could student year 25-26 joyfully and openly change all system flows by the time 15000+ plus delegates review year

Layer 6 AI: Mediating Intelligence Economist's Norman Macrae's Future Vision in 1983 published 2025Report usa 1985 -extract chapter 6
2005-8: The of Centrobank THe INrRoDUcrIoN of the international Centrobank was the last great act of governfnent before governments grew much less important. It was not a conception of policy-making governments at all, but emerged from the first computerized town meeting of the world. By 2005 the gap in income and expectations between the rich and poor nations was recognized to be man's most dangerous problem. The satellite TC system and two-way cable television channels in sixty-eight countries invited their viewers to participate in a computer conference about it, in the form of a series of weekly TC programs. Recommendations tapped in by viewers were to be tried out on a computer model of the world economy. If recommendations were shown by the model to be likely to make the world economic situation worse, they were lntroduction t sl l THE 2025 REPORT to be discarded. If recommendations were reported by the model to make the economic situation in poor couptries better, they were to be retained for "ongoing computer analysis" in the next program. In 2025 it is easy to see this as a forerunner of the TC conferences which play so large a part in our lives today, both as pastime and as the principal innovative device in business. But the truth about this 2005 breakthrough tends to irk the highbrows. It succeeded because it was initially a rather downmarket network television program. This is illustrated by the fact that the two gold-medal-winning telecommuters who were eventually acclaimed for contributing most to Centrobank's birth were Mr. S. C. Hu, the thoughtful and rich retired merchant of Taipeh in Taiwan, and Mr. Bjorn Heglund, the earnest young subpostmaster from the Kiruna district of north Sweden. Neither would conceivably have been consulted if a conference on the subject had been called mainly among the best-educated economists of 2005. About 400 million people watched the first program, and 3 million individuals or groups tapped in suggestions. Around 99 per cent of these were rejected by the computer as being likely to increase the unhappiness of mankind. It became known that these rejects included suggestions submitted by the World Council of Churches (whose "Charter 2006" was reported by the computer to be likely to increase unhappiness among 87 per cent of the population of the world) and by many other pressure groups. This still left 31,000 suggestions that were accepted by the computer model as worthy of ongoing analysis. As these were honed, and details were added to the most interestitg, an exciting consensus began to emerge. Later programs were watched by nearly a billion people as it became recognized that something important was being born. These audiences were swollen by successful telegimmicks. The presenter of the opening part of the first program was a roly-poly professor who was that year's Nobel laureate in economics, and who proved a natural television personality. He explained that economists now agreed that aid programs could 52 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobank sometimes help poor countries, but sometimes most definitely made their circumstances worse. When Mexico was inflating at over 80 per cent a year in the early 1980s, the inflow to it of huge loanable funds made its inflation even faster and its crash more certain. The professor set Mexico's 1979-81 economy on the model, pumped in the loaned funds and showed how all the indicators (higher inflation, lower real gross domestic product, and so on) then flashed red, signalling an economy getting worse, rather than green, signalling an economy getting better. He followed this with similar examples from several other poor countries in Latin America and Africa during 1950-85. The professor then put the model back to mirror the contemporary world economy of 2005, and played into it various nostrums that had been recommended by politicians of left, right and center, but mostly left. The dials generally flashed red. Then the professor provided another set of recommendations, and asked any viewers who wished to play to tap in their own guesses for the consequent movements in twenty economic variables in the model. Those who got their guesses right to within a set error were told they had qualified for the second round of a knock-out economic guesstimators' world championship. Knock-out competitions of this sort continued for ordinary users of two-way TCs throughout the series of programs. In the second part of that first program the presenters dared to introduce two political problems into the game. They said that government-to-government aid programs had been particularly popular among politicians during the age of overgovernment, but there was growing agreement that government- to-government aid was the worst method of hand-out. The excessive role played by governments in many poor countries was one of the barriers to their economic advance, and a main destroyer of their people's freedom. Could anybody think it would have been wise to give aid to President Mbogo? In consequence, the most successful economic aid programs had been those operated through the International Monetary Fund, which imposed conditions on how borrowing governments should operate. The professor showed that IMF-moni- 53 THE 2025 REPORT tored operations in most years had brought more green flashes from the model than red, which few other sorts of schemes had done. But this involved IMF officials-often from the rich countries- in telling governments of poor countries what to do; and one of the objectives of the initiative called for by President Kennedy was precisely to diminish such embarrassments. The first questions to be asked in the next few programs, said the compilers, were (l) which countries should qualify for aid?; and, having decided that , (2) up to what limits and conditions?; and (3) through what mechanisms? They promised that later programs after the first half-dozen would examine how any scheme could be used to diminish the power of governments and increase the power of free markets and free people. The first stage of this computerized town meeting of the world went remarkably well. A consensus quickly emerged that poor countries which agreed to join a club with certain libertarian nrles (the principal ones were that markets instead of politicians should set prices; there should be fairly free trade, and fairly free immigration of people and businesses from countries richer than themselves; human rights cases should be referred to an international supreme court) could also have access to the benefits of a new international central bank called the "Centrobank." The Centrobank should be a body which relied very little on the discretion of its governor, but much more on a computer program. This program should authorize the Centrobank to print enough new foreign exchange called bancor for any applicant country below a certain income per head to allow its internal economic growth to proceed at the fastest possible noninflationary pace but not by one penny faster. The Centrobank's computer would monitor each recipient country's economy to see if inflationary or other strains were appearing, and would signal that Centrobank must cut off new supplies of artificially created foreign exchange if they did. Contemporary critics said in triple self-contradiction that (a) this scheme was so insulting to poor countries' governments 54 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobonk that few would agree to join it; (b) all poor countries would flock to eat at this trough and there would be an impossibly inflationary expansion of world money supply; and that (c) the anti-inflationary terms proffered from the international central bank were so tough that this would still allow only painfully slow economic depauperization. Now that the Centrobank has been in operation for nearly twenty years we know that the answer to (a) is that the government of any poor country that does not join Centrobank is likely to be booted out by its people; that the answer to (b) is that, despite this flood of countries into the scheme, newly created foreign exchange for poor countries has in only one year,2Ol3, exceeded 0.2 per cent of world-wide money supply (WM3); and that the answer to (c) is that progress proved remarkably fast, although that was partly because of the answers that emerged to the second set of questions posed in the next few programs. The second set of questions which arose after about the eighth program rested on what sorts of purchases should qualify for Centrobank payments. Originally the notion had been that the international Centrobank should open foreign exchange clearing accounts to finance non-inflationary purchases by any persons or any groups in qualifying poor countries. The stated aim was that a poor country should not be prevented merely by shortage of foreign exchange from pursuing the fastest possible rate of non-inflationary economic growth. But under the remorseless logic of the computer a bias was soon introduced in favor of financing purchases by citizens in poor countries rather than purchases by their governments.It became clear that projects by cost-disregarding governments in poor countries led more quickly to inflation than projects undertaken either (a) by penny-pinching native entrepreneurs (who began to apPear out of the woodwork in some profusion and in extraordinary places); or (b) by competing multinational corporations on new sorts of performance contracts. If you ask your TCs today, "What were the main evil con- 55 THE 2025 REPORT sequences of the colonial and immediate post-colonial periods in the poor two-thirds of the world?" two of the top answers will be: "The fact that an entrepreneurial class could not emerge as an important political constituency until the introduction of Centrobank after 200 5 :' and "The fact that until Centrobank no mechanism except uncompetitive government was put in place to meet many of the most urgent demands of the poorest three-quarters of the peopl e." Centrobank's solution to the first of these problems owed much to the proposals from Mr. Hu; its solution to the second problem owed much to the proposals from Mr.Heglund. Start with why Mr. Hu's proposals for encouraging entrepreneurs were so important. Growth had taken place in Europe and Japan and North America after 1850 because an entrepreneurial commercial class had become a dominant political influence, replacing the aristocracies in Europe and Japan and the mhlange misdescribed by de Tocqueville in North America. In the immediate post-colonial period in the poor countries circa 1960-2005 power fell instead into the hands of a new class of professional politicians , dt a time when they could temporarily do damaging things inconceivable for professional politicians before or (thank God) since. Their most damaging act was to set "political" instead of market prices. By statutory decree in many poor countries exchange rates and urban wages had been kept too high, food prices to farmers and prices for public utilities kept too low, credit had been allocated by rationin g at negative real interest rates, and imports had been rationed by licences that were immensely profitable to the politicians' brothers-in-law who were corruptly granted them. Even in 2005 every single computer program showed that living standards were increased, inflation brought down, and huppiness and efticiency advanced, when these policies were abandoned. So did every practical example. Call up on your TCs the practical example of Taiwan in the second half of the twentieth century; analysis of its success was the basis for Mr. Hu's proposals for Centrobank. Taiwan in 56 ,N -; .I, tII 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank 1950-2000 had multiplied its real income twentyfold and its dollar exports four-hundredfold because in the 1950s an invading warlord and his soldiers had been impelled by odd circumstances into laissez-faire economic policies against their will; and because Taiwan had thereafter been kept dynamically entrepreneurial largely because of nasty protectionism by rich countries against its exports. When in 1948 the armies of General Chiang Kai-shek fled from the Chinese mainland to Taiw&r, swelling its population overnight, they found an island which relied for over 90 per cent of its exports on rice and sugar. These were two commodities whose sales could not be greatly increased on world markets by dropping their international price. It therefore seemed natural to the incoming soldiers to follow the mistaken policies adopted by so many other authoritarian governments in poor countries all through 1950-2005. For a while they exploited the farmers by keeping internal farm prices too low and Taiwan's international exchange rate artificially high. The soldiers also granted cheap credits to themselves to set up manufacturing businesses. The results of such folly were the usual ones: food production and exports fell; inflation soared to three-digit figures; and foreign exchange holdings collapsed despite huge American aid. The soldiers met this by restricting imports further to protect their infant industries and their disappearing exchange reserves; this sent inflation even higher. As sugar and rice production used up much land in the overcrowded island, real estate prices in particular went through the roof. This economic mess was sadly typical of many newly independent countries at the time, but Taiwan was lucky in being newly dependent instead. General Chiang Kai-shek was at this time entirely dependent politically on the Americans, and he unwillingly agreed to propitiate them by accepting their good advice. He moved in the late 1950s pretty abruptly from the then usual developing-country wrong policies (low prices to farmers; protected home market for manufactures but overvalued exchange rate; subsidized interest rates) to the unfash- 57 THE 2025 REPORT ionable and precisely opposite right policies (market prices for farmers and market-determined exchange rates and interest rates; trade liberalization). The results exceeded all expectations. With its market-determined exchange rate, Taiwan found that its cheap-labor exports of umbrellas et cetera expanded smoothly-until foreign umbrella-makers objected to Taiwan's penetration of their domestic markets; then Taiwan's expansion in that particular product would abmptly stop. So Taiwan grew through its industrial miracle of 1955-2005 knowing that its businesses must find new products for new markets all the time, and that last year's successful firm would often have to close down this year. In consequence of its recognition that bureaucrats cannot know what will be profitable next minute, Taiwan subsidized only one thing apart from its over-large army: its tax and social nonwelfare policies were directed to raising savings from 5 per cent of national income in the 1950s to a Japan-beating 25 per cent in the 1980s. Mr. Hu recommended that the policies furthered by Centrobank in poor countries should be those that had "been furthered by accident in my country, Taiwan:' and he suggested some of the relevant software by which the Centrobank's computer model could put these incentives into effect. He was rather too inclined to argue that "anybody who does not follow these policies should not get Centrobank aid," but the process of ongoing computer analysis synthesized most of this into the messag€, "If you are following Taiwan-type polici€s, then the computer will allow a much higher level of internal expansion before it flashes the signal that inflation is being fostered so that further Centrobank creation for you must stop." As the coordinating Nobel laureate said when presenting Mr. Hu with one of the two gold medals: His software provided one of the two quantum leaps that turned Centrobank into a success. Although the 1955-2005 Taiwan-type policies hugely expanded national income, the pressure groups in favor of them are entrepreneurs who do 58 2005J; The Introduction of Centrobank not come into being until the policies have already been introduced. In most poor countries that have been following the old and opposite policies of import substitution and pricerigging, the political constituencies in favor of the old policies are by definition more powerful. This is a main reason why these old-fashioned countries remain poor. In some Latin American countries right-wing generals have periodically seized power, and put into effect policies that are supposed to be laissez-faire. But these generals generally have to rely for their political mandate on the few old families who already own big businesses in these countries. Even with the best will in the world (which these right-wing generals rarely have) they tend therefore to support and protect yesterday's big capitalists, rather than the grubby entrepreneurs in back rooms on whom growth most depends. Mr. Hu's proposals managed to make Centrobank's computer programs mirror the dependence on entrepreneurs created by historical accident in the 1950-2005 success stories of Japan (which ploughed through yesterday's powerful families in 1945 and had to rely on entrepreneurs thereafter), Singapore (which benefited from not having any farmers or mral classes to exploit), Hong Kong (which did not have any political constituencies, only entrepreneurs) and Taiwan. Although Mr. Hu was rightly decorated for "enabling Centrobank policies to speak with a Taiwanese accent," the later stages of the first computerized town meeting of the world were carried on more like one of today's many million computer conferences than like the original television network program in which Mr. Hu joined. People after about program fourteen did not put in their views instantly, but after some days' consideration and after checking with the database which showed what was the presumed best form for Centrobank at the moment. The computer still rejected the 99 per cent of proposals made to it that were nonsense; it still incorporated for ongoing analysis the less than 1 per cent of suggestions that seemed sensible and relevant; but it also now introduced a new cate- 59 THE 2025 REPORT gory. It picked up those contrary views that seemed plausibly sensible, but not suitable for the emerging form of Centrobank's consensus, and put proposers of such ideas in touch with people holding similar views around the world. From the views of this constructive opposition to "Hu plus 33,I79 people's telecommunicated and accepted improvements," one new consensus objection began to emerge. "f,Jnder the Taiwanese system," wrote one objector, "the main incentive to entrepreneurs in poor countries is to produce for fairly rich consumers, abroad or at home. If most of the seventy to eighty countries in the Centrobank scheme started exporting cheap-labor umbrellas as Taiwan did in the 1950s , a glut of umbrellas would rather soon appear. It would be better if new entrepreneurs could be encouraged to provide more of the things desperately needed by the poorest three-quarters of the people in these poor lands." How to do this? It was no good saying that poor countries should follow more egalitarian tax policies so as to direct more of their internal demand to things needed by their own poorest people. In the United States in the second half of the twentieth century, marginal tax rates generally took around one half of earned incomes above about six times gross national product per head. Even this only managed to reduce Gini coefficients, the best measure of wealth inequality, from something like 0.39 to something like 0.34. In Africa in 2000 GNP per head was around $500 a year. Any egalitarian tax policy which promised to halve all incomes above $3,000 a year would have (a) killed all initiative; (b) stirred politicians' brothers-in-law, civil servants and-most important-army officers (who got over $3,000 a year) into instant coups d'€tat Moreover, ro mechanisms existed in these countries to provide cheaply the complicated services the very poor needed most urgently. This was the problem that benefited from the proposals of Bjorn Heglund, who had long urged that the public services needed in his native North Sweden should be provided competitively by private entrepreneurs on performance contracts, along the lines of experiments which had been tried in the 1990s 60 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank by various worthy Swedish international aid organizations which "adopted" certain Third World villages. As was said at the presentation of Heglund's gold medal: We at Centrobank began to realize that poor countries could best grow richer by selling simple cheap-labor goods to the rich world-a process that did not involve them in using our proffered foreign exchange at all, although it had become possible only after they responded to Centrobank's initial incentives d la "Hu plus 33,179." The right way to use their new foreign exchange was often to provide mechanisms d la Heglund whereby Western firms are encouraged to make money by providing the services that the poorest three-quarters in the poor world most need. The time was ripe for this experiment, especially in such fields as medicine. The trend even in the West at this time was to new sorts of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), through which people paid performance fees to physicians and their assistants if they kept them pnd their families healthy. It was early decided to put the competitive services provided by multinational HMOs into the pool which would qualify for Centrobank payments. Sophisticated computer measurements of people's health were coming into fashion, and three young doctors just out of medical school at the University of Minneapolis drew the largest single Centrobank payment in 2009 when their HMO, resting heavily on telecommunicated X-rays and long-range computer analyses, plus quickly trained local paramedics and some helicopter- carried Western doctors on call, plus recommended dietary changes and some environmental changes which new staffs personally put into effect (cleaning wells, etc.), brought an extraordinary improvement in the health indices of people over a wide stretch of Africa's desperately poor Sahel. Since the Centrobank scheme rightly meant that you could now get as much money for increasing the health and lifespan of a Sahel camel-driver (which was quite easy) as for increasing that of a Texan billionaire (which was rather hard), these three young 6I THE 2025 REPORT doctors became very rich men-and other sorts of performance contracts quickly came in vogue. This revolution in attitudes and

Sunday, April 14, 2024

Partners sought for final edition of 2025 report

U Guterres, Antonio leads United Nations to 2027. Engineer & Servant Leader: from 17 years Portuguese Red Cross & UN Refugees;PortugalPM

V Huang, Jensen builds the machines most big AI analysis partners use - see 7000 cases; in last 5 years Nvidia partners have multiplied more financial and societal value ever.

.X Fei-Fei Li Stanford since 2009: her world championships demonstrated 2012 that computers can (deep) learn to see. She wanted students & teachers to understand Xponential opportunities & risks as early as congress - see her 2018 testimony C-Span

.Y Hassabis Demis, his work pre-trains computers on pattern games so system designs can match Einstein maths 1905; 120 year opportunity to catch up with drug discovery, life & climate science. Origin London & King Charles AI Park Cambridge-merged with google silicon valley

Z King Charles AI Very Good world series launched 2023 London; leg 2 Korea, Leg 3 Paris , Leg 4 why nt your digital twin sace. Charles first became UN envy fr tech 1964 Tokyo Olympics -as a ten he was fsr to invite Japan's Sony to investing in Europe and first to see Tokyo's chip-led economy. Asia Rising has been deepest commonwealth (Royal Society) responsibility mediated out of London St James since 1843 impacting 2/3 humans who are Asian

Hypothesis there isnt a subject worth peoples time studying or teaching which isnt being changed by engineers & hunan intel. Help footnote list ways AI changing discplines - ask if that changes your discipline

Instructions fpr playing Architect Intelligence Game year 75 started 1951 with NET (Neumann Einstein Turing) and mainly hosted by the Economist years 1 to 40. We'll start by oublishing 100 of 500 intelligences that it would be very good if every student/teacher enjoyed agency to vision with. The game is hypothesised in 2025 around Kings English Large Language Mapping. 8 billion people win the gae if we help make millennilals first renewable generation everywhere. Welcome debate n alternative layout needed in different mother tongues or depending on exponential valuetrue crisiscrisis your place most urhently needs to reconcile. Ocasininally a player has such a timely opportunity in 2025 eg Melinda Gates that we have duplicated her entry. We have tried to position players where their intelligene most positively multiplies intel - but this is part of the exploration as many very good players are heling many of millennials sustainability challenges. Additional resources

www.economistdiary.com

AI20s.com Economistwomen.com abedmooc.com show our progress. This year we will publish 100 human intelligences to linkin ahead of www.unsummitfuture.com chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk whatsapp +1 240 316 8157

U Guterres, Antonio
Astro Ron Garan,

World Service TV Attenborough, Golden Yoko Ono ...
Brooklyn's Ms T & T
Melinda 1 2 Gates 25th year of women empowerment intel: original author of Guterres Digital UN2.0 roadmap from 2017
Sheika Moza, Reeta Roy,
Primary servant leader intel impacting billions of people)
(Fazle Abed)\
(Borlaug alumni)
(James Grant alumni)
(Gandhi alumni)
Paul Polak

Guterres 24 years since ending PM portugal have been as servant leader -red cross, un refugees,

whole of UN:johns hopkins (JH made his money with railways gave back as probability amerca's mot entreprenurial Quaker) now extraordinary twin resource some of Guteeres interests - see focal posts - latest updates 5/22 - Jensen Huang and pixar founder speak at JHK commencement; 5/29 MALARIA RESEARCH

RENOWNED GENETICIST AND PARASITOLOGIST JOINS JHU

New Bloomberg Distinguished Professor Jane Carlton uses tools of comparative genomics to study the biology and evolution of different species of parasites, with the goal of eradicating malaria

(Mandela alunin) , Franciscan cultures: JimYKim
Iqbal & Kamil Quadir
Abdul Latif/J-pl
Bolor Battsengel Mongolia Girls who code & 2022 two-day presentation host wuth UN on digital gov

Deming
Ackoff
Estonia
Mongolia Girls Code

Case Hewlett, Packard
Intel Trio
Martha Chen

Servant Leader cases
Borlaug - extensions through taiwan, and china mainland
James Brant
Lee Kuan Yew
Li Ka Shing
CK Prahalad
Ezra Vogel
Peter Drucker
Abdul Kalam
Nilekani
Sunita Gandhi

Keynes
Cowthr
Harion Owen
Ajay Banga Livable Planet AI

Jason Oxman & Laurie Allen

Ability Summit 2024: Advancing accessibility with AI ...

The Official Microsoft Blog

https://blogs.microsoft.com › blog › 2024/03/07 › ability...

Mar 7, 2024 — Today we kick off the 14th Microsoft Ability Summit, an annual event to bring together thought leaders to discuss how we accelerate .

Rev Al Hathaway- Bloomberg Hopkins

Catchafire

V Huang, Jensen 2015 GPUs: A New Computing Model
January 12, 2016 by Jensen Huang  Taiwan 2016 (93 T's Nvidia95 T's Yahoo & Windows95 ...)  Europe2016 Israel2017 Japan2018  7000 cases by 2023; ibmplay . in last 5 years Nvidia partners have multiplied most financial and societal value ever.2024 tour startups, in silico life science ; us GTC summit 2024 ,local data sovereignty; 1:1 Ilya Sutskever; Microsoft 23 copilot azure next event Taiwan 2 June 2024

Alex is arguably both Jensen's and Fei Fei's MVP though only they can validate that (Ironically Von Neumann's last writings Computer & The Brain 1956 asked digital alumni to apply Neural Nets but 95% of best uses Neumann-Einstein-Turing are not yet popping. That's the good and bad news - we can solve anything with tech until mother earth's climate cancels us!  Alex Krizhevsky is a Ukraine-born Canadian computer scientist most noted for his work on artificial neural networks and deep learning. In 2012, Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever and their PhD advisor Geoffrey Hinton, at the University of Toronto,^[1] developed a powerful visual-recognition network AlexNet using only two GeForce NVIDIA GPU cards.^[2] This revolutionized research in neural networks. Previously neural networks were trained on CPUs. The transition to GPUs opened the way to the development of advanced AI models.^[2] AlexNet won the ImageNet challenge in 2012. Krizhevsky and Sutskever sold their startup, DNN Research Inc., to Google, shortly after winning the contest. Krizhevsky left Google in September 2017 after losing interest in the work, to work at the company Dessa in support of new deep-learning techniques.^[1] Many of his numerous papers on machine learning and computer vision are frequently cited by other researchers.^[3] He is also the main author of the CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets.^[4]^[5]

2016 DC co-launch pilots (via stanford) Bill Daly, Ian Buck (Cuda)

changing coding since 2016 with
Pixar USD ; links Bloomberg Johns Hopkins Commencement 2024;   Clara Life Science AI: Siemens Healthineers; genentech; Swiss hospital a world class data centre AI orthopaedics how to collect data and use end to end with nvidia enterprise AI registry and microsoft azure (includes 2d to 3d modeling) -story Early inspiration MassGen: Jensen: we dont get visits from chip company ceos ; if your trip successful we could only buy 2 gpus
Chin Lin Taiwan "risk of death"ai

AI is now the greatest maths magic ecer seen but this would not exist without digital twinning of Valley And Taiwan Lori & Jensen Huang,
Mr & Mrs Jerry Yang,
Ms &Mr Clara Wu Tsai, (Nb each of these 5 Taiwan trust netwirks has own deep distinctions; eg tsias connect neuroscience at both yale and stanfird; tehy are probably most connected with youth sports/justice/mental health; they also undersatnd what jack ma used to linkin between chinese expats (technically mauice of these 5 networks is elder of china , intel and texas instruments
Lisa Su, in Taiwan
Maurice Chang 1- also Taiwan gives Singapore race as most Intelligent Isle on Planet - see how ministry of youth's Audrey Tang found youth tech wizards to mentor government elders during covid and become minister of innovation; she has recently toured US with book Plurality
Chris Miller -author chips war
NB Mr & Mrs Yang's (& Probably Filo family co-founder yahoo)first sponsor of chair at Stanford was "Chair of Chips"
Mark Horowitz; his 20+ years of continuity at stanfird match Condy Rice's 45 yeras (interrupted for 9 years as foreign secretary); this came together with fei0fei li and 8 other engineering professors with Hoover-Stanford launch 2023 of SETR which twins policymaking AI stanfird-dc started by fei-fei li 2018 congress testimony - see also her book worlds i see and evolution of national NAIRRs (look at King Chares ai word series to map top 20 cooperation nations in national ai transparency. Horowitz is also assicated with ai100 - 100 year futures of AI (5 year updates); nb Stanford annual AIIndex is different. Li & Rice's support of DC now interacr=ts with Raimundo leading chips act and re-emergence f US as chipsd manufacturer. It is difficult to understand whether Economists can keep up with expoential futures - at least 3 people out of Stanford ?hoover AI are rik Jolfsohn (headhunted circ 2021 from MIt as another Chair ofYang familt), setr co-charir with Rice Jhn B Tailor, Stanfird Prof & former fed banker Kevin Warsh 1
Dell HP  Lenovo
Collinson Stripe
Can AI help with ALS
Deep data snowflake, servcemow,
Adobe Getty Image WPP
Understand what Jensen means by get local in owning Data Soverignty - UAE World Gov summit with UAE minister of AIOlama; Mia Motley Barbados

Earth-2 Climate AI & Digital Twin Weather Company CEO Sheri Bachstein & CWA Taiwan Administrator Chia-Ping Cheng ...

see lower down how us digital's big 4 amazon, microsoft, google, facebook connect with Jensen Huang;
also lets identify 10 major industry sector leaders in addition to Jensen's 2 long interests : life science, climate science; see also how nvidia tracks over 1600 ai startups worldwide with several friendly vc's eg Mayfield with its India connections TIE

Scott Farris

jack hidary (host quantum brainstrust   sandbox aqs
J

.X Fei-Fei Li 18.1 23.1 24.1 Stanford since 2009:
Melinda Gates with Jensen Huang first to fund Prof Li NGO AI4all - whilst these lessons may be 10 years old, should be a topic for every grade https://ai-4-all.org/resources/
Girl Empowerment. With Melinda's divorce of Foundations, see her 1st bn funding plan of 10 billion dollars more WIMS (Womens Intelligence Moral Sentiments, Includes 20mn startup awardee:
Allyson Felix is one of the most decorated Olympic athletes of all time and an advocate for Black maternal health, pay equity, and pregnancy protections. She is also the founder of the women’s specific footwear company Saysh
Imagine if WIMS culture diffused every LLM purpose of AI. Might millennials sci-faction yet see world of educational agency, womens productivity and contribution to life valued as at least that of mens, decreasing wars, increasing green data sovereignty
Ajay Banga's livable Planet World Banking

Urgently linkin London Deepest Minds & Stanford's Brain Googlers gravitated by
eg Demis Hassabis & King Charles Cheerleading: AND AI's greatest advances (actioned with Jensen Huang partners) are Life Sciences & Climate Sciences which involve deepest data/leaning ever mapped)
2001 REWIND WEST COAST While 9/11 made 2001 most unsafe ever start to a century, a small ray of light was born on America's Pacific Coast around the same GPS as 1982 Economist's why not Silicon Valley Everywhere (at that time Condy Rice had started mediating Stanford curriculua and Ann Doerr had started to look at where she could support Venture Capatalists (eg her Kleiner Perkins orbit, Sequoia Capital later to originate Nvidia 1993 and Fei-Fei Li chair after 2012's world chang AI chamionshis Imagenet were graced by 2 student Ilya & Alex
seed intergenerational education good

Mr & Mrs Steve Jobs celebrated start of 21st C hosting 65th birthday wish party of :
Fazle Abed - envoy to how up to 1 billion Asian women had grassroots networked to end poverty without electricity or phones until mobile & solar partnerships at end of 20th c. In spite of launching Mac-apple 1984 as antidote to Orwell, Steve & Valley had little experience of the half of world who didn't see electricity until solar. Mrs Steve Jobs has over millennials quarter of 21st C linked WIMS with most of the Valley's leading female influencers -eg look at who she and Anne Doerr co-chair stanfords first new school in 70 years on climate sciences. These include Japan's Mrs Jett Yang bridging Japanese Taiwanes and American engineers & artists & brain scientists interested in young black womens development of suerstars and, justice (eg Tsai family, Neuroscience Schools Stanford-Yale; Women Sportstars Brookyn, Sandiego; Clara WU Tsai on Stanford board)

This changed culture of Stanford (see eg joy of tech's :
Jerry Yang,
Andrew Ng,
Daphne Koller,
joy of law's : Health's Lanhee Chen 1 2

Engineering: Bill Daly all of whom may have scouted out Fei-Fei Li. Her work on computer visioning os 1 most painstaking 2) what was needed fr AI to breakthrough in the 3rd world imagenet championship she hosted annually 2010-2017; LI is most likely to get best out of 3 elders of algorithms Hinton 1; Lecun; Bengio

ultimately every education syllabus un 21st Century is most directly changed -and silos between disciplines - by starting with Li's AI and its innovation of cyber-neuroscience> One of reasons Li's chait sponsored by Sequoia VC who also funded Nvidia as 1993 startup!
Two women with prominent impact as ealry as 1982's Economist Survey why not silicon Valley

Condy Rice - Stanford Dean concerned with scope of student learning: since 2023 teamed up as leader of Hoover with Li & 10 engineering professors to policy brief governments
Mark Horowitz; his 20+ yeras of continuity at stanfird match Condy Rice's 45 yeras (interrupted for 9 years as foreign secretary); this came together with fei0fei li and 8 other engineering professors with Hoover-Stanford launch 2023 of SETR which twins policymaking AI stanfird-dc started by fei-fei li 2018 congress testimony - see also her book worlds i see and evolution of national NAIRRs (look at King Chares ai word series to map top 20 cooperation nations in national ai transparency. Horowitz is also assicated with ai100 - 100 year futures of AI (5 year updates); nb Stanford annual AIIndex is different. Li & Rice's support of DC now interacr=ts with Raimundo leading chips act and re-emergence f US as chipsd manufacturer. It is difficult to understand whether Economists can keep up with expoential futures - at least 3 people out of Stanford ?hoover AI are rik Jolfsohn (headhunted circ 2021 from MIt as another Chair ofYang familt), setr co-charir with Rice Jhn B Tailor, Stanfird Prof & former fed banker Kevin Warsh 1
Anne Doerr with John Doerr at Kleiner Perkins but with a special interest in education (coursera moocs, khan academy), and since 2022 stanford's first ew school 70 tears on climate - see condy and other choices on advisory board
Lila Ibrahim immigrant family Lebanon, engineering graduate Purdue joined Intel (CEO Craig Barrett's team) then Kleiner Perkins Coursera, has now moved to Deep Mind London thus connecting deeepst human advances of Li's Vision training Models and Hassabis Games models (London, Cambridge and snve the valley fro 2014 with google merger)
Hassabis Games which most directly advance nature ai (logics of Einstein 1905 revolution on nature's maths far deeper bottom-up and open that Newtonian hypotheses> His biggest breakthrough Alphafold2 : 250 Million protein databank arguably saving billion hours of human work
Li herself interned chef scientist Goog Cloud 2018 before returning to co-lauch Stanfird HAI
Berkeley's Jennifer Doudna Nobel laureate forn CRISPR Gene databank
Notable Campus building sponsors:
Neuroscience Clara Wu Tsai Fanily (also Taiwanese american) and celebrating heath and social justice of black women including basketball superstars Brooklyn
LI KA Shing HK's Number 1 philanthropist - party of stanford health school

Prashant Kukde

.Y Hassabis Demis, pattern games so system designs can match Einstein maths 1905; 120 year opportunity to catch up with drig discovery, life & climate science.
At google works closely with Sundar Pichai 1
Jeff Dean
Serge Brin
Larry Page (all connected /alumni stanford). NB Arguably Demis is being asked to oversee 3 huge revolutions - future of nature ai (proven by eg alpafold2 games), future of google's gemini and LLM translations between mother tongues, other brain modling contexts. On this hypothesis he works closely with each of top 4 at Mountian View who need to keep bth staff and investors trusting that google's do no evil is also safest global ai network. This matches both King Charles Engish LLM and Von Neumann intent tat LLM wud converge every mother tongues data soverignty to Einstein's/nature's deep evolutionaty maths

Regarding alphafold2 (250 bn proteins) databank watch Life Sciences AI with all top AI. Also:

Pediatrician Priscilla Chan at CZI?meta lntelligence to be youngest. & largest intergenerational phianthropist investing n life science AI.2nd gen Immigrant Vietnam.
----------
other genii- nb please appraise their contributions alongside hypotheisis that google ai partners are do no eveil's safest; nb both google and nvidia are epicentral to valey and hugely linkedin to stanfird alumni; we can hypothesisse traingulatision of nvidia's networks , hassabis & google networks, LI and Stanfird's netwirks integrate aigood and education in deepest ways. Please note you can play game of 100/500 human inteligences by sub-editing your own choices including founding 5 (coluns)
Elon Musk : space/starlink 5000satellites
Tesla
Connections with open ai
X
- one of a kind revoutionary

Bezos - who also competes in satellite space; our one question about Bezos - our communities being hollowed out inecessarily

Sam Altman-we dont agree with his timeline for AGI but obviously you need to watch his space 1

maths of NET - wolfram -

Z King Charles AI Very Good world series launched 2023 london; leg 2 Korea, Leg update 1 May 2023 AI companies that signed up for risk prevention commitments also include Amazon, Microsoft, Samsung, IBM, xAI, France’s Mistral AI, China’s Zhipu.ai, and G42 of the United Arab Emirates. New AI Versions OpenAI (May 2024)
Leg 3 Paris ETA Fall 2024 , Leg 4 why not your digital twin space.
Wendy Tan White CEO of Google's Robotic company intrinsic and Nvidia case leader (advisory quantum Sandbox.aq), White's husband Joe White has been UK tech envy to San Francisco now broadened to envoy for all King Charles AI World Series partnerships. Wendy's family Brit imigrants from Myanmar
Emperor Naruhito connects 60 years of relationships King Charles has developed with Japan Emperors originally as UK's teenage royal representative to Tokyo Olympics 1964. There Charles practical ability to unite tech worldwide began when he asked Sony's Morita to be the first Japanese investor in Europe. Charles noticed the city that was then number 1 user of silicon chips with its microelectronics and Deming-led system capabilities. (Moores Law of 100 timse exponential of chip power every decade began a year later thanks to Intel receiving its largest ever order from a Japanese calculator manufacturer)
Also the model of supercities that has seen Asia Rising initially from Japan to S Korea, Taiwan, HK, and Singapore. As well as smart city architecture, Charles & Naruhito share interest in water and climate intelligence.
Tokyo Mayor Yuriko Koike was one of 2016 movers and shakers calling for UN2.0 desinged round educational transformation and women AI engineers. She is interested in smart city collaboration eg Tokyo NY London> because her father was in oil shipping her alma mater is Cairu University making her one of quite a large number of womens intelligence 100 who grew up with experience of middle east.Koike has been an energiser of mayors animating Bloomberg city alliance and supporting Data - see eg 10t year celebration of Data Act at new Bloomberg Johns Hopkins camus - 555 penn avebue - also a 5 minute trt from congress1

Lila Ibrahim (see Hassabis) as she's now COO Deep Mind London, comes from a Lebanese family who immigrated to mid west. Hence Lila's engineering quailification at urdue before getting a job at intel , then at Kleiner Prerkins connecting Ann Dierr's interest in coursera moocs before taking on chalenge as Deep Mind's popular stiryteller of what its expert au engineers are up to.
MIchelle Donellan 1 2 emerged in UK as a public servant heroine duRing Covid. Riki Sunak gave her the responsibility to produce the Bletchley/Turing/King Charles AI world Series: London, Korea. The UK has an election in July. Hopefully Donellan will be fund a way to continue AI world series ; in any event this doubles up importannce of Joe hite and Lila Ibrahim as already key to UK as key national ai player as well as key to Sovereign Data of Kings Englush Large Language Modeling.
Arm ceo is a lynchpin of both British AI and kings charkes estate iwnership of Cambrdge busiebss park number 1 in European AI.Arm also evolved out of BBC and Acron computing.
David Attenbough is BBC and world leader in natural intelligence. As a Prince, Charles was often seen at Royal Geirgraphical sov=ciety and oatron induence to awards network ashden. The London Royal Societes are Jewels in crown of interdosciplinary innovation. They have already played a huge role in Ai with the neuroscociety Gatsby having been a lead sponsor of hassabis during his soctiral years. In fact Hasabsi had been sponsored by Garsby (see also brainfacts) to be in stabfr =d and meeting feifei Li on her arrival rgwew =e in 2009.
Its interesting how many connections in intelligence world are made by the Royal game of tennis. If has brought Japan and UK families close. With Frances 2 great events in 2024 - Olympics, 3ef leg of AI World Series it would be great if female sports superstars and AI rockstars coud twin yiuth's celebration. Billy Jean King assisted by Salesforce Benioff is leading the way - see this PBS proram. It would be particularly cool if her Japan pick Naomi Osaka (Tennis Champion. Tokyo Totch Bearer, Black lives matter) coul bridge sports and AI worlds. Perhaps 2025 6-month osaka expo could be relay 4 og King Charles Ai. This wiuld alo help remember the late Abe's interest in deep data (he called osaka track) and AI's impact on soc5.0

Lee Kuan Yew
From singapore global network heroines to celebrate

Jackie Yi-Ru Ying Senior Fellow & Director,NanoBio Lab, A*STAR awarded the prestigious King Faisal Prize in Chemistry (2023), David and Lucile Packard Fellowship and the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) Allan P. Colburn Award. She is an elected Member of the U.S. National Academy of Engineering, and German National Academy of Sciences – Leopoldina, TÜBA

Valuation AI changing every numerical profession

AI changing every profession like law dependent on applying history of published rules

AI is ending disciplinary silos

In corporations AI is changing "need to know"; rg if top people need to know then people at edge of customer /society relationships need to know. Preventing exponential risk (ie Ai safety) is meaningless unless organisational systems (let alone networks of partners) are getting rid of need to know

Partnerships cannot value sustainability of next generations if partnership has need to know constraints on any side.

Life sciences and climate sciences can make huge leaps wiyh million times more comoutational power of deep data offered by advanced comuting archiecture. From 1966 to 2012 one cpu design almost monoplised comuting- this was one dimensional slow. Advanced comuting started in games tat required mutidimensional real time computation. REasons why "the sciences" leap firward with accelerated comuting o back to en=instein 1905 publications that nature maths is far deeped in system interactions than newton's maths could hypothesise or measure/see. Actually every risk to humanity is partlu=y assocuated with leadeship models not chnaging to integrate Einstein maths. THe NET (Neimann Einstein Turing) who gave us engines for brainworking and ultimaty for autonomous real tuke governance spent their last decade bbriefing media and ecoonomsts on this chalenge. Indeed they suggetsed a survey; what good will people unite wherever they get first access to 100, 1000, or million times more tech every decade. We can nw see that from 1965 moores law , sikicn valey linked engineering (also Jpaan deming) was pioneering 100 times more per decade. When satlellite pc netwrking started scaling those accessing this were designing futures with 1000 time more per decade eg from 1995 or tgerabouts. From 2012 or thereabouts, advanced computing architecture has offered coming of million times more. Thos who saw ai world championships hosted by feifei li saw 212 as when the whole world could see deep learning AI fr giid wiud need to map million times more. In 2018 LI testifed to congress that million times more computing machines were being rolled out primarily by nvidia but with eg AMD and ARM accelerating race between all transfirnimg to advanced comuting architecture

To date (74 years into dad's first briefings from Von Neumann) all AI is connected with engineers - hence our last edition of 2025 Report is designed around the game - identify first 100 then 500very good human intelligences most helping three triplets advance AI for all humans- todays maths goats Huang, Hassabis, Li; mid 20th C greatest Neumann-Einstein-Turing; Places leaders whose sovereign intel now depends on eg retaining their own Large Language model and deep data

It is likely that the main fieldbook of our last edition will impact the user like a travel guide to 1000 very good human intelligences

There are several inspirations to how future history genre of 2025 report but the one understood my today's co-editors starts in 1945 with Economist Editor Geoffrey Crowther. Geffrey edited London's weekly journal The Economist for over a decade before and after world war 2's conclusion. He also edited the centenary autoboigraphy of The Economist in 1943. As he said this was a unique opportunity to make sense of 100 year journalism instead of weekly reporting

In 1945 the exponentially deepest engineering question was could the impacts of engineers 2025-1945 celebrate more human good relationships around mother earth than the media and electricity engines begun out of Switzerland's IRU in 1865.

If the new engines of 1865 had root caused 2 world wars, it was likely that consequences of Engines 2025-1945 woul be be expoentially far better of far worse. As a Keynesian, Crowther was interested in what locks in possinbilities of next generations futures. My family entreeed into Crowrher's inquiry as dad had spent his last days as teen nanigatir allied bomer command burma, surviving he was in Keynes last class before Crowther hired dad and by 1951 sent dat to Priceton/New York to ask Von Neumann (and his NET: Einstein, Turing) about expoential multipliers

During the fisst 13 years that The Economist sever quesyioning of leaders included the NET's expected accelerations , Kennedy, Prince Charles and Japan's Emperor influenced the future - see www.econokistjapan.com; in effcet the pacific ocean (california to the coastal belth Jpaan Korea Taiwan HK and Singapore) had become an alternative innovation space to the atlantic theatre (Us east coast, and the 3 euoopes of isnads, of itu and central europe, and the EU's 6first 6 countries og 1955 which faf observed as only journalist Messina 1955)

So as we search for very good intelligences - 4 centre of gravities worth including:

how stanfrd became epicentre of global competition of training comuter brans (Fei-Fei Li epiecente before and after 2012)

the consequence of Jensen huang beettinng furtire comter design on 2012's ai breakthrough

the consequences of hassabis desinging intelligence games martching einstein's natural science revolution of 1905!

the cobsewquences of King Charles inviting commonwealth and turing worlds to LM Kings Ebglish in AI World series from Bletchley 2023, Korea and Parus, and why not space yot place digiral twins AI Soverigty

For Scots we could go back earlier. In 1758 Smith had asked what wil be the triangulaisation of

1 natures systems

2 humans moral sentiments

3 man mafe (aeruficial) engines that his Glasgow University compatriot James Watt was emerging

Smith's explorations of compound systems are context rich. Scitlabd had become a coloy of London Kings since 1710s. Smith wanted to see a continent nit just one bellicose island be free to design enginnering futures. So he wasnt unhapply when Celtic friends led tea parties and US independence though Smith would not hav intended doubling down of Englosh Empire on two thirs of humans who were Asian

While we are looking forclues to crossroads that spiun rounf sysyems - its interestin to ask when did the King's english become the lingua franca of world trade.

When it comes to LLM (Large Language Mapping) it helps to see when did English become the world's business language - somewhere between 1666 when dutch gave the english what became new york, late 1690s when Newton turned from cambridge science academic to master of London Mint (newly designed pounda gold standard) or 1730s start up of Lloyds; in any event this was before the start of engineering 1760 an birth of independeent usa 1776

Saturday, April 13, 2024

Nvidia ^ the World from 1993 to 2025

Some dates approximate - we welcome rvisions & if use happy to link to your profile somewhere

WE began eporting brainworkers words adter briefings drom Von Neumann & his peer NET (Neumann-Enstein-Turing) applied over 40 years by dad norman macrae at The Economist ; I was bien in 1951 so growing up with computers was quie curious - in london thery were'nt seen in high schools (Slide ruler was best tool maths people before i started my gap year in 1968; i worked at ministroy f transport; there a director was getting cards ounched in binary - there was a shared mainframe t the central electrcty generating biard; somrimes I was odered to carry the binary cars to and fro; apparently if one card goy t out f rder the whole verninght prgrm broke down;

anyhow it is sort f amazibg that even when personal comouters arrived eg 1984 beng famous year of apple mac and rical ibm pc getting microsoft software the central processing unt dir sequentail comouting

Enter 1993 Nvidia and jensen huang - building acceerated comoutng fir comouters sequetial one dimensonal comouting cant do

2 years later 1995 microsoft windws arrved ad a secnd taiwanese amer=ican started up - Jerry Yang Yahoo;

yu can see nvsia's stry at

blog eg featured jensen stories includeexecutive officer and a member of the board of directors.

NVIDIA to Build Earth-2 Supercomputer to See Our Future

The earth is warming. The past seven years are on track to be the seven warmest on record. The emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are responsible for approximately…Read Article

article 2015/6 explaims world summits piloted from 2009 includes:

GPU Deep Learning “Big Bang”

As I wrote in an earlier post (“Accelerating AI with GPUs: A New Computing Model”), 2012 was a landmark year for AI. Alex Krizhevsky of the University of Toronto created a deep neural network that automatically learned to recognize images from 1 million examples. With just several days of training on two NVIDIA GTX 580 GPUs, “AlexNet” won that year’s ImageNet competition (annual world championships hosted by Stanford's Fei-Fei i; , beating all the human expert algorithms that had been honed for decades. That same year, recognizing that the larger the network, or the bigger the brain, the more it can learn, Stanford’s Andrew Ng and NVIDIA Research teamed up to develop a method for training networks using large-scale GPU-computing systems.

The world took notice. AI researchers everywhere turned to GPU deep learning. Baidu, Google, Facebook and Microsoft were the first companies to adopt it for pattern recognition. By 2015, they started to achieve “superhuman” results — a computer can now recognize images better than we can. In the area of speech recognition, Microsoft Research used GPU deep learning to achieve a historic milestone by reaching “human parity” in conversational speech.

Image recognition and speech recognition — GPU deep learning has provided the foundation for machines to learn, perceive, reason and solve problems. The GPU started out as the engine for simulating human imagination, conjuring up the amazing virtual worlds of video games and Hollywood films. Now, NVIDIA’s GPU runs deep learning algorithms, simulating human intelligence, and acts as the brain of computers, robots and self-driving cars that can perceive and understand the world. Just as human imagination and intelligence are linked, computer graphics and artificial intelligence come together in our architecture. Two modes of the human brain, two modes of the GPU. This may explain why NVIDIA GPUs are used broadly for deep learning, and NVIDIA is increasingly known as “the AI computing company.”

podcast

on-demand parner videos using new accelerated comouting

or this inm travck of major nvidia summits since 2015

2015 Wahington DC - opening headline Deep Learning

Future Histry of Media & Coding 2025-1951

As Von Neumann's biographer from meetings 1951until Neumann's death, my dad practised seeing both futures at The Economist until early 1990s; we know very wel ups & downs f media; we need some help in connecting the dots of coding eg

here are some dots

advantage of my age is i have details on coding languages since start of computer- dad any research f book on von neumann; what matters today is 2 opposite coding languages- all those still of Microsoft and from around 2006 CUDA; from 1993 Nvidia started designing 2nd type of ("accelerated" computer -originally for games it had to handle multiple simultaneous analysis which historically computers never had; it wasn't until 2006 that nvidia started shipping its programming language Cuda in every chip it shipped; please do some chats on cuda ideally in both English and chinese LLMs- I think I know where people can study Cuda at lowest cost and maximum impact but best you check; people like dell and Lenovo say they are no longer shipping personal computers and servers without AI ie without cuda; I am sure there are many full time coders you will meet as your coding career multiplies - but its all at a crossroads literally this year-

chance meetings with new coders

2016 world bank youth summit girls coder Audrey Cheng (American Chinese graduate funded Kenya coding schools then at covid returned to Florida? to be partnership director Discord;

Mongolia's xxx hosted un tech evoy digital 2 days summit 2022 coinciding with UNGA; what girl coders around her had helped the nations herdsmen and leaders code in facing fast changing climate and some of the toughets conditins landlocked asin countres face in site f roud civiisation - see when mongolia pax rued the oriental world's consciousnee

reconnecting women coder of cuda could be useful and Melinda gates having divorced bill gates foundations now has 12 billion dollars to invest in women engineers and women community/open space builders

Wednesday, April 10, 2024

EW: circulated by Melinda Gates 29 may 2024 - most exciting idea of 2024 imagining WIMS world (Womens Moral Intelligent Sentiments)

Melinda French Gates Announces $1B Commitment to Advance Women’s Power Globally

May 28, 2024

Today, Melinda French Gates announced that as the first step in the next chapter of her philanthropy she is committing an additional $1 billion through 2026 to advance women’s power globally.

With the rollback of women’s rights and headwinds to social progress in the U.S. and around the world, Melinda believes that now is the time to provide urgent capital to people and organizations fighting to protect and further equality and remove the barriers that hold women back. This includes investing in the health and well-being of women and families, in line with her belief that health is a critical lever in enabling women to have their full power in society.

This $1B commitment will include the following grants made by Pivotal Philanthropies Foundation:

$200 million

in grants aimed at supercharging the work of organizations that are fighting in the U.S. to advance women’s power and protect their rights, including reproductive freedom. These grants will be structured to provide flexible funding to spend as organizations see fit.

$240 million

devoted to partnerships with a diverse group of 12 global leaders. Each leader will be provided with a $20 million fund to distribute to charitable organizations they consider to be doing urgent, impactful, and innovative work to improve women’s health and well-being in the U.S. and around the world.

$250 million

to be awarded through an open call, launching later this fall, with Lever for Change to identify organizations working to improve women’s mental and physical health worldwide.

"For too long, a lack of money has forced  organizations  fighting for women's rights into a defensive posture while the enemies of progress play offense. I want to help even the match."

Melinda French Gates

This new commitment includes the following organizations and individuals.

Supercharging the Work of Organizations

Center for Reproductive Rights

The Center for Reproductive Rights is a global human rights organization of lawyers and advocates fighting for reproductive freedom around the world. For over 30 years, the Center has played a critical role in securing victories for abortion, contraception, maternal health and more within the halls of the U.S. Congress, before national and international courts, and at the United Nations. The Center’s goal is a world where reproductive rights are treated as fundamental human rights.

Collaborative for Gender + Reproductive Equity

The Collaborative for Gender + Reproductive Equity provides funding to unite advocates across issue silos, defend gender, reproductive, and racial equity, and work towards a future where every person has the resources and autonomy to thrive.

Collective Future Fund

The Collective Future Fund is an intermediary feminist fund that brings together social justice movements, survivors, and donors to heal, resource, and mobilize toward a future free from violence.

Community Change

Community Change is a national organization that builds the power of low-income people, especially people of color, to fight for a society where everyone can thrive.

Institute for Women's Policy Research

The Institute for Women's Policy Research is a national think tank with a mission to win economic equity for all women and eliminate barriers to their full participation in society. It builds evidence to shape policies that grow women’s power and influence, close inequality gaps, and improve the economic well-being of families.

MomsRising Education Fund

MomsRising Education Fund is a nonpartisan public charity that is part of the MomsRising movement, a grassroots organization of more than a million people who are working to achieve economic security for all moms, women, and families in the United States.

Ms. Foundation for Women

The Ms. Foundation for Women is a nonprofit organization that builds women’s collective power in the U.S. by investing in, and strengthening, the capacity of women-led movements to advance meaningful social, cultural, and economic change.

National Domestic Workers Alliance

The National Domestic Workers Alliance works for the respect, recognition, and rights for more than 2.2 million nannies, housecleaners, and home care workers who do the essential work of caring for our loved ones and our homes.

National Partnership for Women & Families

The National Partnership for Women & Families is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that works to make life better for women and families. It advocates for health and economic justice, reproductive rights, and policies that support women and families in the 21st century.

National Women's Law Center

The National Women's Law Center fights for gender justice—in the courts, in public policy, and in society. It uses the law in all its forms to change culture and drive solutions to the gender inequity that shapes our society and to break down the barriers that harm all of us—especially women of color, LGBTQ people, and low-income women and families.

New America

New America is a think and action tank dedicated to renewing the promise of America in an age of rapid technological and social change. Its work prioritizes care and family well-being, advances technology in the public interest, reimagines global cooperation, builds effective democracy, and ensures affordable and accessible education for all.

The 19th

The 19th is an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics, and policy. Its goal is to empower women and LGBTQ+ people—particularly those from underrepresented communities—with the information, resources, and tools they need to be equal participants in our democracy.

Roosevelt Institute

The Roosevelt Institute advances ideas that rebalance power in our economy and democracy, and invests in leaders and experts to create a more equitable, high-care, and low-carbon future.

States United Democracy Center

The States United Democracy Center is a nonpartisan organization advancing free, fair, and secure elections. It connects state and local officials, law enforcement leaders, and pro-democracy partners across America with the tools and expertise they need to safeguard democracy.

TIME’S UP Legal Defense Fund

Housed in and administered by the National Women's Law Center, the TIME’S UP Legal Defense Fund connects people facing workplace sex harassment and related retaliation with legal and PR assistance.

Washington Center for Equitable Growth

The Washington Center for Equitable Growth is a nonprofit research and grantmaking organization dedicated to advancing evidence-backed ideas and policies that promote strong, stable, and broad-based economic growth.

Partnering with a Diverse Group of Global Leaders

Dr. Alfiee Breland-Noble

Dr. Alfiee Breland-Noble is a pioneering psychologist, scientist, author, founder, and expert devoted to mental health and suicide prevention in intersectional youth and young adults of color, including LGBTQ+ youth and those with disabilities. She is the founder of The AAKOMA Project.

Allyson Felix

Allyson Felix is one of the most decorated Olympic athletes of all time and an advocate for Black maternal health, pay equity, and pregnancy protections. She is also the founder of the women’s specific footwear company Saysh.

Ava DuVernay

Ava DuVernay is an award-winning filmmaker whose groundbreaking work aims to advance equity and social justice by telling stories that change hearts and minds. She is the founder of ARRAY, a multi-platform arts and social impact collective.

Crystal Echo Hawk

Crystal Echo Hawk is a leader and advocate working to advance contemporary stories of Native Americans in an effort to shift public perception and increase support for Native peoples and issues. She is the founder and CEO of IllumiNative.

Gary Barker

Gary Barker works to promote gender equality and create a world free from violence by engaging men and boys in partnership with women, girls, and individuals of all gender identities. He is the CEO and founder of Equimundo: Center for Masculinities and Social Justice.

Hauwa Ojeifo

Hauwa Ojeifo started a movement that gives mental health a voice in Nigeria, enabling those with mental health conditions to tell their own stories, co-create solutions, and advocate for their own rights. She is the founder of She Writes Woman.

Jacinda Ardern

Jacinda Ardern is the former prime minister of New Zealand who has shown the world how leading with compassion can drive impact. She is a passionate advocate for climate action and a fierce champion for women, including through her continued leadership of the Christchurch Call.

Leymah Roberta Gbowee

Leymah Roberta Gbowee, 2011 Nobel Peace Laureate, is a Liberian peace activist, trained social worker, and women’s rights advocate. An award-winning global thought leader for peace and social justice, she is the founder and president of the Gbowee Peace Foundation Africa and the executive director of the Institute on Gender, Law, and Transformative Peace at the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law.

M. V. Lee Badgett

M. V. Lee Badgett is an economist focusing on economic and social inequality for LGBTI people. Her research explores strategies for improving people’s lives and livelihoods, along with building ideas for the global advancement of LGBTI economic power. She is a founding partner of Koppa: The LGBTI+ Economic Power Lab.

Richard V. Reeves

Richard V. Reeves is a scholar working toward gender equality for all by raising awareness of the problems faced by boys and men today. He is the founding president of the American Institute for Boys and Men.

Sabrina Habib

Sabrina Habib works to improve access to quality, affordable early childhood care in East Africa’s low-income communities. She is co-founder and CEO of Kidogo.

Shabana Basij-Rasikh

Shabana Basij-Rasikh has dedicated her entire life to ensuring Afghan girls’ access to education. She is the co-founder of the School of Leadership Afghanistan.

READ MELINDA'S OP-ED IN THE NEW YORK TIMES

About Pivotal

Since Melinda French Gates founded Pivotal in 2015, we have used different kinds of funding to achieve our mission to advance social progress, including venture capital investments, philanthropic grantmaking, advocacy funding, and partnerships. In 2022, Melinda formed Pivotal Philanthropies Foundation, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, to support philanthropic grantmaking and help enable this flexible approach to driving impact.

.	curiosity https://www.google.com/search?q=%22study+fetch%22+nvidia Monthly trade newsletters from interesting hi-tech places : Taiwan

This is a story Grok and I would like to discuss with any american parent or teenager. please note all errors are mine - i am here to learn chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

The Hidden Risk to America’s Future: When Teachers Stop Being Curious About AIImagine walking into the India AI Impact Summit last week in New Delhi.
Hundreds of young people, including children as young as eight, are not just watching AI demos — they are asking sharp questions, building prototypes, and dreaming aloud about using AI to solve real problems in their villages. The energy is electric. Curiosity is everywhere.Now picture a typical American classroom in 2026.
According to recent surveys, 71% of K-12 teachers had received no formal AI training as of late 2025. Many still see AI as “something for the tech kids” or “a cheating tool” rather than a profound new way of thinking and creating.This is not a small gap. It is a strategic risk to America’s future.Jensen Huang’s Three Wake-Up Calls for EducatorsAt the heart of this risk is a profound shift that NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang has been describing for the past year. He offers three simple but powerful insights that every teacher and parent should hear:

“Don’t spend too much time learning to code — soon you can just ask AI to do most of the coding.”
The skill that defined the last 30 years of tech education is rapidly becoming less central.
Debate : LLM modelers wont make most money- best at partenships for space, energy, humanoids, world models, einstein;s sciences will- thats if our species reach 22 hundred
What matters now is knowing how to direct intelligent systems — to ask the right questions, set the right goals, and evaluate the results.
“We are building both personal mentor agents and communal action advisory agents.”
AI is not just a tool for individuals. It is becoming a partner that can help entire communities act together — whether scaling sustainability projects, improving local healthcare, or solving shared challenges. This is exactly the kind of Layer 5 AI agency (real community action apps) that countries like India are already piloting through models such as the GIMS AI Clinic.
“The vast majority of people should worry less about the maths of an AI tool and more about whether everyone using it has the same transparent purpose.”
Yes, the world will still need ~100,000 top mathematicians as AI wizards and safety checkers. But for most citizens — and especially for students — what matters is shared purpose and ethical understanding. Teachers don’t need to become coders or mathematicians. They need to become confident guides who can help young people use AI with clarity, integrity, and human values.

These are not abstract ideas. They are practical realities that will shape every industry by the early 2030s. Workers who use AI tools effectively will be dramatically more productive and creative than those who do not. The gap will not be small — it will be generational.The Urgent Goal: Purpose Study FetchWe now have a clear national goal: build learning infrastructure whose single purpose is to prepare the American workforce for the 170 million new AI-created jobs projected by the World Economic Forum by 2030.Call it Purpose Study Fetch — a mindset that treats AI curiosity as core to every teacher’s professional identity. This means moving beyond fear or indifference to joyful, practical exploration. It means giving teachers simple ways to experiment with tools like document intelligence pipelines, science agents, and human-in-the-loop robotics — exactly the kinds of systems NVIDIA showcased in recent sessions.Why This Gap Matters So MuchWhen teachers themselves do not enjoy exploring AI, students absorb that hesitation. Curiosity is contagious — so is disinterest.
Countries like India, Japan, South Korea, and Singapore are actively training their young people to build and govern the next generation of AI systems. Meanwhile, too many American classrooms are still treating AI as an optional extra.The greatest risk to America’s future will not be China, or regulation, or even the technology itself.
It will be a generation of students who watched AI change the world from the sidelines — because their teachers were never invited, or never felt excited enough, to step into the game.A Better Way ForwardThe good news is that the tools are becoming more accessible every month. Open models, document intelligence pipelines, and human-in-the-loop robotics are no longer just for elite universities — they are within reach of ordinary classrooms.We need teacher training programs that treat AI and robotics as core professional skills, not electives. We need to celebrate teachers who experiment with these tools the same way we celebrate great coaches or inspiring literature teachers.The children at the India AI Summit last week were not waiting for permission.
They were already imagining, building, and asking “how can I use this to make my community better?”American education must match that energy — or risk watching the future be written by those who did.

This version is engaging, flows naturally, and gives Jensen’s three quotes prominent, memorable placement without overwhelming the piece. It keeps the tone hopeful while making the urgency clear.Would you like me to:

Shorten it further (e.g., for LinkedIn or a blog)?
Add the 5-layer visual from earlier?
Strengthen any section (e.g., more on robotics or the 170 million jobs)?
Or adjust the title/tone?

Just say the word and I’ll revise it immediately. This is a strong, important article — let’s make it land well.

Youth's other America - 4 July 2025: for the first time usa is due in next 3 years to host both of youth's greatest worldwide uniting sports stages - soccer world cup and olympics- can the world bank start up intelligences greatest relay this month- begin with sinagpire sending is university designers and cambridhe queens sending its presidential cheerlead of demis hassabis biotech's number 1 Ai wizards---Grok says about 5 million po[ulation of Singapore- Singapore’s fusion of faiths, with Chinese (Buddhist/Taoist) and Muslim (Malay) as key pillars, makes it an exceptional benchmark for connecting these histories of world intelligence. Smart Nation and SEA-LION bridge Chinese and Muslim legacies through AI-driven inclusivity, fostering trust and trade across communities and inspiring ASEAN []. Its equitable growth and multicultural policies set a global standard, though addressing inequality remains key

Advanced llm examples: 1

WHO IS GENERATING "INTELLIGENCE" FOR?
Best ever clues may come from October 2024 in DC Bipartisan interview of Nvidia's Jensen Huang - see first video below or help us map where in washington DC Intelligence for all is rising. Golden oldies: (2008!): Sample from 30 videos while Nobel Judges installing Yunus Poverty Museum Dhaka- now in 2024 they are belatedly awarding some AI people

2008

Goal 1 - 2008

Goal 2 food (human energy) & 7 machine energy

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang are major, interconnected figures in the 2024–2025 artificial intelligence landscape, often collaborating to define the future of AI infrastructure and national competitiveness.

Key Interactions and Joint Initiatives (2024–2025):

Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP): Schmidt and Huang are guiding a new Task Force established by the SCSP and NVIDIA to secure America's technological future in AI, aiming to build a national response to rapid AI advancement.
"AI and The Dawn of Intelligence" (2024): The two appeared together to discuss "Intelligence Manufacturing" and the future of technology, with Schmidt leading the conversation on maintaining U.S. competitive edge.
Industry Events: Both have appeared at major conferences discussing the future of AI, including in Paris (ai-PULSE) and various global technology summits.

Shared Perspectives and Commentary:

The "AI Worker" Warning: Schmidt has echoed Huang’s famous sentiment that "you are not going to lose your job to AI, but you are going to lose your job to somebody who uses AI". Schmidt emphasized that professionals must embrace AI to remain relevant, noting that AI is an "accelerator for learning".
Sovereign AI: Both have stressed the necessity of nations building their own "sovereign AI" infrastructure to maintain independence, with Huang encouraging countries to build large language models for cultural independence.
Geopolitical Concerns: Schmidt has raised concerns that "free" Chinese AI models could overtake Western closed-source models in global adoption, a challenge they are both addressing through policy and technology.
Respect: Schmidt has praised Huang as "one of the greatest people in our times" regarding the AI race.

In 2025, Jensen Huang was recognized as the Financial Times 2025 Person of the Year for his influence on AI.

includes Very old stuff eg from 15 trips to Bangladesh - women empowerment hero fazle abed and conflict host mugammad yunus.

1-2-3 of Happiest Education Summits of Millennials World

AM5.5.. TO 1 2...hi your lunchclub profile looks fascinating - I am not expert in your practice areas but i interviewed fazle abed brac bangladesh 15 times - notes at www.abedmooc.com - happy to try and share more info if relevant - in washington dc chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
special thanks LC creators eg 0 1

water water everywhere but not a drop to drink;; tech tech everywhere but no apps to sustain generations; nature chaos math demonstrated by all the world's covid fitting into a coca-cola bottle but vaporised into the atmospheres we breathe... these puzzles have maths solutions - hopefully!
AM5.4 To 1..2.. 3

TO AH: hi look forward to lunch friday; only been to capetown once circa 1983 working for unilever at the time trying to leap beyond apartheid; probably my greatest friend in s africa taddy blecher - he founded new university but after 15 great years 1999-2013 - seems to have disappeared - do you know anything about him? My dream connect all graduates 20-35 working on borderless sdg solutions needed communities everywhere- i dont believe my generation has mass tech ability to lead?!

chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk - wash dc & glasgow
BETWEEN 1984 & 1993 COUNTDOWN TO SUSTAINABILITY WAS PUBLISHED & UPDATED BY THE ECONOMIST'S NORMAN MACRAE & SON CHRIS - Below original published chapters of 2025 Report-
how can we help each other with humanity's next leaps forward?
- see some ideas discussed in recent months: lunchclub :: linkedin ::
teachforxx.com ::teachforsdgs.com :: ABED.MOOC.com summifuture.com economistdiary.com ... see also 20 other economist eg economistgreen.com economistamerica.com for sale - prices from 100$ up depending on collaboration purpose

chapter contents

chapter 6 fintech to end poverty

chapter 7 AI JOBS

chapter 8 AI education

chapter 9 virtual productivity ai maps

2025 report page index us 1985 printing if you need page lasered rsvp chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk

chap 10 transforming government -AI

CHAP 11 - AI HEALTH

CHAP 11 bis AI health part 2

24 alien judgement - are humans safe to share intel with?

chapters 1 to 5 discussed what peaceful nations needed to do to help all peoples be more productive as berlin wall fell- sadly the west did not values livesmatter enough- if you want to re-read every opportunity lost ask chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk to send you chapters 2 to 5 or discuss at www.economisteurope.com

.Sustainability's future - The Economist 1972

BRAC annual reports

Economist's 1 2 survey of twin Asia Rising models of linking in village rural Keynesianism and superport win-win trading routes (Japan Korea South Taiwan HK Singapore ... maps which it took JFKennedy less than 7 days to endorse

good to see the opening plenary of ecop26 starring a young kenyan female alumni of Wangaari as well as Banker for Poor's forestry Prince Charles

historically related: speech prince charles & princess Di japan tour 1986