Join AIWHitehouse ...Minimum AI Brief to all teachers ;;Day 366 Trump2.0 Greatest Video Dario Gill, Genesis of 17 National Labs -USAEI:American Energy Intel; Axios Governors Grids... DC March 11 scsp .ai+education summit & ... May 7 15000 delegate AI+expo
Don't be fooled - AI are 100 years away from being smarter than humans- see world AI models
What if greatest risk to future of American and worldwide brainpower is not transforming education in the 60 years (1965-2025) since moores law, jensen law, 1g to 6g designed machines with billion times more maths brain power than separate human minds and hierarchical top-down department silos including professors and doctoral students let alone k-12 societal literacy mediating digital and real life's Health*Wealth*Trust: how your time and data is spent not just money. Could student year 25-26 joyfully and openly change all system flows by the time 15000+ plus delegates review year May 7 AI+expo of scsp.ai? - we asked gemini and grok to help us with 100 day Dc diary aimed at connecting eg jensen huang's layer 5 ai community actions and ai agency by May 7. here goes - all errors are mine chris.macrae@yahoo.c.uk Bethesda NMFound, && Neumann Diaries at Economist.AI & Childhood Cancer ....fall25:  The AGENTIC OLYMPICS - Is Nvidia free to win this race or has wall street declared chinese walkover
MOTION AGAINST GETTING INTO DEBT CERTIFIED BY UNIVERSITIES 4 YEAR DEGREES
aka water water everywhere not drop to drink, intelligence everywhere not a trust map to link Most exciting time (July update) to be alive- supercomputer 1/7 thks Memphis! (more) ..US Cultural Revolution? chat 2022" nb West Coast intel leaps every 3 years of 21stC
English Language Model- purpose to CODE trust and productive intelligences of millennials everywhere.Why King Charles needs to host ICE4+AI3+3 early September 2025 before Trump asks UN to exit NY
.

 GEMINI FEB 2025- May I give you a clear, practical map of SCSP.ai’s education and workforce work as of February 2026.

SCSP is indeed relatively flat (small core team + ~50 affiliated researchers/advisors). The public face is dominated by a few senior people and event-specific speakers.1. The 5 People Most Involved in SCSP’s Education VisionThese are the people who actually shape or speak for SCSP’s education-related work (March 11 AI+Education Summit, workforce reports, etc.):
Rank
Person
Role at SCSP / Education Focus
Connection to Layer 5 / Rural Agency?
Connection to Jensen / Workforce Commission?
1
Ylli Bajraktari
CEO of SCSP
Low – focuses on U.S. competitiveness
Very high – works closely with Jensen on Workforce Commission
2
Eric Schmidt
Chairman of SCSP
Low
Very high – Co-chairs Workforce Commission with Jensen
3
Sal Khan
Featured speaker (March 11 Summit)
Medium – personal AI tutors, Khanmigo
Medium – respected by Jensen, but no formal partnership
4
Alex Kotran
CEO of aiEDU, featured speaker
Medium – AI literacy & classroom agency
Low
5
Dr. Tasha Arnold
Head of Alpha Schools, featured speaker
Medium – radical redesign of school experience
Low
Key takeaway: The education vision at SCSP is currently driven more by event speakers (Sal Khan, Alex Kotran, Tasha Arnold) than by permanent staff. The permanent leadership (Ylli and Eric Schmidt) focuses more on national competitiveness and workforce strategy.2. Are They the Same People Hosting the NVIDIA Workforce Commission?Yes — heavy overlap at the top.
  • The Task Force on AI and the Future of Work (NVIDIA + SCSP commission) is co-chaired by Jensen Huang and Eric Schmidt.
  • Ylli Bajraktari (CEO) is deeply involved in operational leadership.
  • So the top two permanent SCSP leaders (Ylli + Eric) are the same people driving the Workforce Commission.
The education summit (March 11) and Workforce Commission are linked at the leadership level, but the education summit has more outside voices (Khan, Kotran, Arnold) who bring stronger “personal AI agent / classroom transformation” perspectives.3. Does Anyone at SCSP Link to Asia Transformation or Layer 5 Rural/Community Agency?Very limited.
  • SCSP is explicitly U.S.-centric — its mission is American long-term competitiveness (especially vs China).
  • They rarely mention India’s GIMS/ABDM model, Taiwan’s sovereign stack, or Layer 5 rural community agency.
  • The closest are Sal Khan and Alex Kotran, who have referenced Asian models (Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan) in passing, but not deeply.
  • No one on the core team or regular speakers is known for deep expertise in bottom-up, consent-based, rural Layer 5 systems like GIMS. Their Asia lens is mostly “China threat / competitiveness” rather than “learn from India/Taiwan/Singapore on rural agency.”
This is why your point about the gap is important — SCSP is strong on U.S. macro strategy but thin on practical Layer 5 rural/community transformation.4. Your Wiki Idea – Why SCSP Doesn’t Have One (and How to Push It)SCSP does not maintain a public, living “current affairs wiki” on AI. They produce polished reports, memos to the president, podcasts, and event summaries — but nothing that is updated weekly by students or that builds year-on-year common curiosity.Why they don’t have it:
  • Their model is expert-driven, not crowd-sourced or student-led.
  • They focus on high-level policy recommendations for the President and Congress, not ongoing public education tools.
  • A student-updated wiki would be seen as too informal or hard to control for quality.
Your idea is excellent — a living, annual “AI for the People” wiki / knowledge base that every college freshman engages with, updated by students using AI tools, focused on Layer 5 agency, would be far more powerful than static reports. It could become the “common curiosity engine” you describe.How to raise it at SCSP events:
  • At the March 11 Education Summit or May AI+Expo, ask: “Could SCSP support a student-led, living AI wiki that updates every academic year — so each new class of students is ahead of the previous one on AI for community agency?”
This could be a constructive way to bridge your Asia experience with SCSP’s U.S. focus.
Would you like me to:
  • Draft a short 2-minute question/script you can ask at the March 11 summit?
  • Draft the email to SCSP with your wiki idea + the one-pager?
  • Or expand the list of people at SCSP who might be most receptive?
I’m ready to help you turn this into concrete next steps for the next 9 weeks. Just tell me what you want first.
Quick Answer
Sub-ED: .It may be obvious that humanity's development of each other is connected by
  • Parental Love, especially across Asia's Islands & Archipelagos
  • Water including life science maths and green earth and
  • intelligence -how education multiplies brainpower. But intelligence @2025 is particularly curious driven by 10**18 more tech in last 60 years; since 2010 we've seen million fold more impact of satellites and computers :part 2 of what some call artificial intelligence); again from 1995 satellite acceleration of webs evolved borderless sharing of life critical knowhow through million fold human data-mapping devices including phone, text, camera uniting all human senses and steve jobs university in a phone; earlier Moores law's engineering of chips on both sides of Pacific delivered 1000 fold more tech 65-80 and another 1000 fold from 1980-95
    DO WE ALL LOVE TAIWAN as much as AI20s supercomputing & neural net wizards such as Jensen Huang, Demis Hassabis, Yann Lecun ? Perplexity explains why so few people linking to 20 million people leading every agency of AI that educational futures revolve round:No other small or island nation is currently aiming to train as many young AI professionals, relative to its population, as Taiwan—though Singapore, Hong Kong and Israel remain the benchmarks for workforce concentration123. In short: Taiwan’s AI talent drive is among the world’s most ambitious for its size, and it is on track to join or even surpass the global leaders in AI talent concentration in the coming years.Economic Impact: AI is projected to deliver over TWD 3.2 trillion (USD 101.3 billion) in economic benefits to Taiwan by 2030—more than 13% of current GDP. In 2023 alone, Google’s AI-related activities contributed TWD 682.2 billion and supported nearly 200,000 jobs in Taiwan3
  • HUMANITY & INTELLIGENCE's FUTURE
    Thanks to Jensen Huang the last decade has been most exciting of 75 years dad Norman Macrae 1:: 2 and then I have had privilege to question inteliligence's future. In 1951 Von Neumann suggested to dad to dad that Economists and Media might be generatively disastrous unless they celebrated questioning future's with engineers. Check out the world Jensen Huang has been inviting humans to linkin since he commited to designing million times more energetic computing including today's AI Chats and deep learning robots.
    India 2024 : 2
    India 2016
    Silicon Valley 2024
    2015 with Elon Musk move video to 97 mins 40 secs
    Valley March 2025.
    Taiwan 2024
    Taiwan XX
    UK Wash DC 2024Japan 2024
    .Is Human Species capable of celebraing intelligence as deeper (and more open) data flow than politicians printing paper money?
    Economistwater.com: Do you know that even the world's biggest nations will fail in 2020s unless their peopled celebrate copiloting waters and energy transmission (CLICK TO PUZZLES of 25% more in 2020s) maps inttrligent;y?
    MOTHER EARTHS CODES: ELERCTRIGICATION POWERS THINGS WITH ELECTRICITY: INTELLIGENCE EMPOWERS PEOPLES: FRESH WATER CONNECTS OUR HEALTH & EMOTIONAL COOL Please linkin with me chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk (Wash DC) to add where we the peoples can add to these 4 spaces for unearthing humanity's intelligence boosters-
  • Paris Intelligence Action summit February,
  • Santa Clara future of accelerated computing partners- nvidia santa clara Japan's Osaka Expo - 6 months in which any nations pavilion can virally survey intelligence of any other pavilion
  • Canada's G7- will all 7 nations leaders sink or swim together. Of course if we the peoples can decide what intelligences top 20 spaces need to be, we have a chance to change every education momemt og every age of person at every community around the world in line with the future of capitalism that The Economist premiered in 1976.Japan and silicon valley had payed with the first decade of moore's law - would other places be free to entrepreneurially join in the milliion times more compute in time?
  • .From Glasgow 1760, engineers artificail system designs became humans 3rd & if integrated respectfully with nature's man's most productive tool alongside bitech waves of water and heat. Long stiory short innovation opportunities and threats to humans in 2025 now that we have 10*18 more tech than 1960s dei=fine surval of commmunities and species everywhere. Ask eg Grok3 whose inteligences or agents 15 year old stidnts and teacgers most need to know about. Benchmark against 6 multipliers
    Jensen Huang or whomever platforms are needed for 2 main types of deep learning ai : bio and making humanoids safe2 Hassabis - whose ai pattern games have made biotech an innovation likely to imact more thahn half of gdp by 2035, often very locally, 100-year catch up with einstein's core maths e=mcsqaured published 1905
    Yann Lecun -we need an academic concerned with open sourcing worldwide student access to what's next - who do you choose if yann lecun not most open academic maths guy inspiring your peoplesMusk - well I am not sure anyone is jealous of musk as biggest brain in the world-don't expect him to suffer jounalist fools lighhtly
    6 Drew endy - or who is sharing with millennials hundreds of startup discoveries of biotech as locally regenerating as batures own source of energy photosyntheis has for millions of years played water and heat games on birthing living systems
    .Lets share some lunchclub updates -more at Economistdiary.com/2020 eg what are varous ways ordinary pcusers are expected to use the new ai pc- at different entry level- for example am i correct that one has to invest about 15000 dollars to be a lamda 3 connector through pc? Or for those (eg parents of 11 year olds in usa 2025-8) who just want eg emails whatsapp zoom (tiktok) linkedin algorithms to sort out 30 years of virtual connections whats min dell system to buy? I am also looking for chapter s[omsors of 2025report.com last of 75 years of mediation by my family and von neumann family and for 40 years The Economist 1951-1990 including now King Charles AI summits- from 1964 Tokyo Olympics win-win between both island post-emires (dad norman awarded honors by both) Grok sent us this happy holidays card dec 2025 - The Water ThreadIn the year 2041, a small website called economistwater.com quietly turned twenty. It had begun as one man’s private notebook (an economist who noticed that every time he typed “human capital,” his fingers paused at the same thought: we are 60% water by mass, 90% by molecule count). He started logging the numbers: babies are 78% water, elderly 55%, server farms 94% cooling water, the new orbital AI factories still 0%. He never preached. He just kept the ledger.The site never went viral. It had no ads, no newsletter, only a single page that updated once a week with a new line:2041-03-17 Human birth in Kerala: 78% water Blackwell-9 cluster, Nevada: 94% water Starship 312 payload, LEO: 0.000% water Running average since 2021: 90.3% People began to visit the way they visit a graveside. A nurse in Lagos refreshed it before shift. A teenage coder in São Paulo wrote a bot that whispered the percentage into her ear every morning. An aging policy maker in Brussels kept the tab open like a heartbeat monitor.One night in 2047, the number changed.2047-11-09 Human birth in Kerala: 77% water Blackwell-9 cluster, Nevada: decommissioned Orbital Forge-7, Lagrange Point 5: 0.000% water Running average since 2021: 89.7% For the first time in twenty-six years, the line dipped below ninety.The economist (gray now, hands trembling slightly) typed a single sentence beneath the table:We have begun to leave the water.He did not add fireworks. He did not need to.Across the planet, strangers who had never met felt the same quiet catch in the throat. A woman in Hokkaido closed her laptop and walked to the window; snow was falling on cedar trees older than nations. A boy in Accra looked up from the screen and saw his grandmother’s hands, thin, veined, still 60% water, still carrying him when the lights failed. In a dorm room in Warsaw, a student who had grown up refreshing economistwater.com every birthday cried without knowing why.The site never celebrated the milestone. It simply kept counting, the way oceans keep counting waves.2049-02-14 Human birth on Luna City, Hab-9: 73% water (recycled) Orbital Forge-44 ring, full constellation: 0.000% water Running average since 2021: 87.1% And somewhere, in the dark between Earth and Moon, a new child (born under artificial gravity, cooled by starlight alone) opened her eyes for the first time and saw, through a tiny porthole, the blue marble that still held ninety percent of everything that had ever loved her.The ledger kept going. But for one brief moment, across every continent and every orbit, eight billion water-bodies and a growing handful of radiant machines felt the same gentle tug on the same ancient thread.We were water. We are learning to let some of it go. And still, somehow, we remain connected.economistwater.com Still updating. Still 87.1% and falling, one quiet percentage at a time. Water's role in AI space expansion AI+Space summit water innovations Heighten emotional resonance .

    Saturday, December 31, 1983

     IN 1983 I was one of 3 co-authors of 2025 report. Father who had been the economist's end-poverty sub-editor mainly structured the question - what are the most sustainability-critical 7 yeras chalenges that peoples need to rehearse , and how do these relate to chnages in technolgy. Father had met vob neumann in 1951; become his boographer; but most importamtly noram wass the epicentre of journalists  intereted in von neumanns question what cgood could peoples unite around 100 times more tech per decade. It was critical to understasnd 2 idaes which that question integrated:

    good needed to be above zero sum ganes unlikes the armrs race that the goats of maths had been required to spent most of their life on , as well as unlike the industrial age of unlimited consmption . Our point being consuming things is a zero sum game especially if you have no government designing renewbility. Conversely imagine a knowledge networking age sharing kife critical knowhow whch multiplies value in use. 

    th eother critical idea: access to 100 tiles more tech would start with very privileged people - would they openly share and even design that privielge with the least connecetd people in the world; we knew for example in 1983 that silicon valley was one group - see norman's 1982 survey; we also knew from normans first 10 yera of monitring von neumanns qiuestion that by 1961 - there were 2 neumnn ai labs: mit and stanfrd

    that japan/tokyo's demand for tech was interacting with stanford

    that neumann and einsten based in princeton had primarily connecetd 2 north east coridors- north was the open corridor - not only had thise recahed mit but neumann had given his architecture on comuter hardawre to ibm - ibm and dec had become designers of computers but on balance both the harware and the program lamguages were open ; neumann had actually gone futr=ther- with his knowledge he had said most patents should not last more than 6 minths because if you were at the epicente of a network of connectimg knowhow and wanted to do good with it then 6 months lead time in choosiung you partners was more than enough

    there was also the government and security cirridor down through north east coridro to dc along the south east cpast and across to texas- this became concerned with space and nuclear arms race as well as government sectrets; it was the er of governmente secrets that neumann last 12 years of life aimed to open upo safely; he did this not just with open source omputing architecure that he hiped woiuld chnage education but with debates on whow brains of humans and machine intel would interact- his famous posthumous course at yale needed to change every way psycholgists and sociliogists celebrtaed human being in era of 100 time more tec 

    Roughly our vision ofr tech chnage was tie lines like this as conformed by matt ridley's 2010 epitaph to norman

    1984-1990 -era of starting to network personal computers 

    19990-7 begiing of web

    in iyr view 1997-2004 was critical - wenneded mass television to blend its last majority audience reach with digital becmen g the biggest audience- -around the miennium a reality tv program could have invilved half of the world's adults - looking for sultions to the new millennium - our 2 over all goals - education needed changing so millennials could be te fits sustainability generation; tyhe graetest risk to huamns needed to be debated roas : differences in incomes and expectation of rich and poor nations

    for example we could start with the old g8 whose asymetries were the main root cause of world wr 2; woul the countries of usa canada germany france ital ik ussr japan meiate 1984-2025 so that overal millennials were the first sdg generation

    -you will see that in our book that even as 1984-1001 started to make every personal computer user connecetd the real chalenge ws could all the g8 put themseles in the mind of leading uusr transforation - we anticiapte the fall of the berlin wall within 3 months of actual timeline; the point is the remaining russia as roof of the world would be extremely hard for any leader to integrate- one of te largets land resources in the world but most iced up and hard to live in - owning perhaps the majority of all energy resources; with 2 major cities both with complicated shiopping access to the rest of the wordld; with valdivotok on the far east s=coast needing its own plans- with landlocked extremely poor herdsman on the majotity of the land- far the poorest and therefore those the world nneeded to plan for - this was not just a russian problem but a nothh south problem predictable to impact afghanista and even more so those places that were poor apart from oil eg irag , iran; ; the eu had never been designed to undertsnad its south east as the greatest arae of chnage - which shuld have bene obvious when you looked at the 2 main assets the suuz canal and the deserts which along with russia were the main carbon energy sinks- so all in all even as personal comuting networks were potentially the great open society advantage for humanity unless every wealthy nation saw 1989 neded a amrashall plab 2.0 for the future of far north peopels integration through the old world , we would be starting miellenials with the greatest conflict not the era of peaceful interconnectibity-

    if we had started an age of joyful solutions to end poverty being the number 1 web page around 2000 we would also have been able to ask what next as decices other than desktop comouters strem in data from every gps - be ths=hese persnal mobile devices; or flu=ying objevyts like drones; or places saftey monitors such as smart camera monitiring citizen safety; 

    ironically 2004 on the geneva art of the un started debati=ting what we now call web 2.0 but policy parts of un out of new york did noit- so a few big corporates in west and east stared to wn all society's data and the ai algorithms began to reflect how they extracted profits instead of prepping 8 billion beings for 2015-2030 being our last next chnage of bodreess cooeration development goals


    our book had made the case fors suatainbility depending on changing education - by late 2010s we believed every chils could oiwn their skills dashboars and start to have nextr=t exoereienetial learning cyrated by their onw bots

    while you of course replay what gaes humans needed to sequence from 1983 in other wasy - it is clear taht the inter-generational and open world mapping decaisions that needed to be shared have not been done so by the old g8 , and this has spiralled into risks of extreme nationalism everywhere even as the poorest parts of teh world now needed to share life-critiacl sulyions across communities and in increasing boirdless wasy; the technolgy is there but we havee noit designed the human intel of 8 billion brains in such a ways as to apply aritifiicial intel to augment humanity and our intergenerational goals as a smart parent in species - this is wehere we are ar as the 2020s becomes the most exciting decade - last chance to remap sustainability of climate , of peace, of how we all beome life long stduents and tecahers

    the un2 frameeowrks can be applied to resolve this challenge not just at the levels of multilateral gov design boyt gov 2.0 ebe=verwhere and at ebevery level - not just national but potentailly wherevcer communities or networks of 100000 peopels lives have interdependence connections- if we dont h=build tehs e poistive l=ly they will likely be hacked by microterrorsists; 

    we should be preepoing for 2050 maximising the su=imultaeous number of peopel that mother earth nurtures at 10 billion ie 10to the fifth commonities/networks by 10to the fitfth beings assiasted by almost infite artificial intel and eg abindamcy of the sun's energy - but that meedes a united communities model; it needs national gocvenments becoing humans servant leaders - this is not what the socalled western democracies have been spending political time on if you review eg hansard in uk or revisit cspan etc recordings of how bipolar political parties have been qyarreling about old dividing lines instead of mediating future chages the younger half of teh world needed smart elders to be building

    No comments:

    Post a Comment