Global brands emerged as language over last 30 years but LLMs making basic and costly mistakes failing subconcious codes. Ask for example chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Over 50 years ago at The Economist dad Norman debated main purposes of satellites - pity human intelligence has not done this. "Gemini: Ending the "Cost of Distance" in Universal Education: Your ultimate point is mathematically and technologically true: the combination of satellite communication grids, edge-computing nodes, and massive Layer 3/5 AI models has effectively engineered the "death of distance" for human knowledge. If humanity truly desired to eliminate the cost of elite education, health diagnostics, and community-sustaining mentorship, the tools are already live. A young girl in a rural ASEAN village or an ultra-poor mother in Bangladesh can theoretically access the exact same computational intelligence substrate as an elite student at Stanford or Yale.
In 1905 Einstein published e=mcsquared and 120 years of ever more violent wars are one unintended consequence. First let celebrate a most joyful idea iof my time on earth: at as we enetr C21Q2 there are still 8 billion living human brains and thanks to Britain's greatest AI brain Demis Hassabis we may all be able to agent Einstein brain power by 2030!
Join AIWHitehouse ...Minimum AI Brief to all teachers ;;Day 366 Trump2.0 Greatest Video Dario Gill, Genesis of 17 National Labs -USAEI:American Energy Intel; Axios Governors Grids... DC March 11 scsp .ai+education summit & ... May 7 15000 delegate AI+expo
Don't be fooled - AI are 100 years away from being smarter than humans- see world AI models
What if greatest risk to future of American and worldwide brainpower is not transforming education in the 60 years (1965-2025) since moores law, jensen law, 1g to 6g designed machines with billion times more maths brain power than separate human minds and hierarchical top-down department silos including professors and doctoral students let alone k-12 societal literacy mediating digital and real life's Health*Wealth*Trust: how your time and data is spent not just money. Could student year 25-26 joyfully and openly change all system flows by the time 15000+ plus delegates review year

Sunday, February 28, 1971

 Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang are major, interconnected figures in the 2024–2025 artificial intelligence landscape, often collaborating to define the future of AI infrastructure and national competitiveness.

Key Interactions and Joint Initiatives (2024–2025):
  • Special Competitive Studies Project (SCSP): Schmidt and Huang are guiding a new Task Force established by the SCSP and NVIDIA to secure America's technological future in AI, aiming to build a national response to rapid AI advancement.
  • "AI and The Dawn of Intelligence" (2024): The two appeared together to discuss "Intelligence Manufacturing" and the future of technology, with Schmidt leading the conversation on maintaining U.S. competitive edge.
  • Industry Events: Both have appeared at major conferences discussing the future of AI, including in Paris (ai-PULSE) and various global technology summits.
Shared Perspectives and Commentary:
  • The "AI Worker" Warning: Schmidt has echoed Huang’s famous sentiment that "you are not going to lose your job to AI, but you are going to lose your job to somebody who uses AI". Schmidt emphasized that professionals must embrace AI to remain relevant, noting that AI is an "accelerator for learning".
  • Sovereign AI: Both have stressed the necessity of nations building their own "sovereign AI" infrastructure to maintain independence, with Huang encouraging countries to build large language models for cultural independence.
  • Geopolitical Concerns: Schmidt has raised concerns that "free" Chinese AI models could overtake Western closed-source models in global adoption, a challenge they are both addressing through policy and technology.
  • Respect: Schmidt has praised Huang as "one of the greatest people in our times" regarding the AI race.
In 2025, Jensen Huang was recognized as the Financial Times 2025 Person of the Year for his influence on AI.

No comments:

Post a Comment