Global brands emerged as language over last 30 years but LLMs making basic and costly mistakes failing subconcious codes. Ask for example chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Over 50 years ago at The Economist dad Norman debated main purposes of satellites - pity human intelligence has not done this. "Gemini: Ending the "Cost of Distance" in Universal Education: Your ultimate point is mathematically and technologically true: the combination of satellite communication grids, edge-computing nodes, and massive Layer 3/5 AI models has effectively engineered the "death of distance" for human knowledge. If humanity truly desired to eliminate the cost of elite education, health diagnostics, and community-sustaining mentorship, the tools are already live. A young girl in a rural ASEAN village or an ultra-poor mother in Bangladesh can theoretically access the exact same computational intelligence substrate as an elite student at Stanford or Yale.
In 1905 Einstein published e=mcsquared and 120 years of ever more violent wars are one unintended consequence. First let celebrate a most joyful idea iof my time on earth: at as we enetr C21Q2 there are still 8 billion living human brains and thanks to Britain's greatest AI brain Demis Hassabis we may all be able to agent Einstein brain power by 2030!
Join AIWHitehouse ...Minimum AI Brief to all teachers ;;Day 366 Trump2.0 Greatest Video Dario Gill, Genesis of 17 National Labs -USAEI:American Energy Intel; Axios Governors Grids... DC March 11 scsp .ai+education summit & ... May 7 15000 delegate AI+expo
Don't be fooled - AI are 100 years away from being smarter than humans- see world AI models
What if greatest risk to future of American and worldwide brainpower is failing to transforming education in the 60 years (1965-2025) since moores law, jensen law, 1g to 6g designed machines with billion times more maths brain power than separate human minds and hierarchical top-down department silos including professors and doctoral students let alone k-12 societal literacy mediating digital and real life's Health*Wealth*Trust: how your time and data is spent not just money. Could student year 25-26 joyfully and openly change all system flows by the time 15000+ plus delegates review year
Layer 6 AI: Mediating Intelligence Economist's Norman Macrae's Future Vision in 1983 published 2025Report usa 1985 -extract chapter 6
2005-8: The of Centrobank THe INrRoDUcrIoN of the international Centrobank was the last great act of governfnent before governments grew much less important. It was not a conception of policy-making governments at all, but emerged from the first computerized town meeting of the world. By 2005 the gap in income and expectations between the rich and poor nations was recognized to be man's most dangerous problem. The satellite TC system and two-way cable television channels in sixty-eight countries invited their viewers to participate in a computer conference about it, in the form of a series of weekly TC programs. Recommendations tapped in by viewers were to be tried out on a computer model of the world economy. If recommendations were shown by the model to be likely to make the world economic situation worse, they were lntroduction t sl l THE 2025 REPORT to be discarded. If recommendations were reported by the model to make the economic situation in poor couptries better, they were to be retained for "ongoing computer analysis" in the next program. In 2025 it is easy to see this as a forerunner of the TC conferences which play so large a part in our lives today, both as pastime and as the principal innovative device in business. But the truth about this 2005 breakthrough tends to irk the highbrows. It succeeded because it was initially a rather downmarket network television program. This is illustrated by the fact that the two gold-medal-winning telecommuters who were eventually acclaimed for contributing most to Centrobank's birth were Mr. S. C. Hu, the thoughtful and rich retired merchant of Taipeh in Taiwan, and Mr. Bjorn Heglund, the earnest young subpostmaster from the Kiruna district of north Sweden. Neither would conceivably have been consulted if a conference on the subject had been called mainly among the best-educated economists of 2005. About 400 million people watched the first program, and 3 million individuals or groups tapped in suggestions. Around 99 per cent of these were rejected by the computer as being likely to increase the unhappiness of mankind. It became known that these rejects included suggestions submitted by the World Council of Churches (whose "Charter 2006" was reported by the computer to be likely to increase unhappiness among 87 per cent of the population of the world) and by many other pressure groups. This still left 31,000 suggestions that were accepted by the computer model as worthy of ongoing analysis. As these were honed, and details were added to the most interestitg, an exciting consensus began to emerge. Later programs were watched by nearly a billion people as it became recognized that something important was being born. These audiences were swollen by successful telegimmicks. The presenter of the opening part of the first program was a roly-poly professor who was that year's Nobel laureate in economics, and who proved a natural television personality. He explained that economists now agreed that aid programs could 52 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobank sometimes help poor countries, but sometimes most definitely made their circumstances worse. When Mexico was inflating at over 80 per cent a year in the early 1980s, the inflow to it of huge loanable funds made its inflation even faster and its crash more certain. The professor set Mexico's 1979-81 economy on the model, pumped in the loaned funds and showed how all the indicators (higher inflation, lower real gross domestic product, and so on) then flashed red, signalling an economy getting worse, rather than green, signalling an economy getting better. He followed this with similar examples from several other poor countries in Latin America and Africa during 1950-85. The professor then put the model back to mirror the contemporary world economy of 2005, and played into it various nostrums that had been recommended by politicians of left, right and center, but mostly left. The dials generally flashed red. Then the professor provided another set of recommendations, and asked any viewers who wished to play to tap in their own guesses for the consequent movements in twenty economic variables in the model. Those who got their guesses right to within a set error were told they had qualified for the second round of a knock-out economic guesstimators' world championship. Knock-out competitions of this sort continued for ordinary users of two-way TCs throughout the series of programs. In the second part of that first program the presenters dared to introduce two political problems into the game. They said that government-to-government aid programs had been particularly popular among politicians during the age of overgovernment, but there was growing agreement that government- to-government aid was the worst method of hand-out. The excessive role played by governments in many poor countries was one of the barriers to their economic advance, and a main destroyer of their people's freedom. Could anybody think it would have been wise to give aid to President Mbogo? In consequence, the most successful economic aid programs had been those operated through the International Monetary Fund, which imposed conditions on how borrowing governments should operate. The professor showed that IMF-moni- 53 THE 2025 REPORT tored operations in most years had brought more green flashes from the model than red, which few other sorts of schemes had done. But this involved IMF officials-often from the rich countries- in telling governments of poor countries what to do; and one of the objectives of the initiative called for by President Kennedy was precisely to diminish such embarrassments. The first questions to be asked in the next few programs, said the compilers, were (l) which countries should qualify for aid?; and, having decided that , (2) up to what limits and conditions?; and (3) through what mechanisms? They promised that later programs after the first half-dozen would examine how any scheme could be used to diminish the power of governments and increase the power of free markets and free people. The first stage of this computerized town meeting of the world went remarkably well. A consensus quickly emerged that poor countries which agreed to join a club with certain libertarian nrles (the principal ones were that markets instead of politicians should set prices; there should be fairly free trade, and fairly free immigration of people and businesses from countries richer than themselves; human rights cases should be referred to an international supreme court) could also have access to the benefits of a new international central bank called the "Centrobank." The Centrobank should be a body which relied very little on the discretion of its governor, but much more on a computer program. This program should authorize the Centrobank to print enough new foreign exchange called bancor for any applicant country below a certain income per head to allow its internal economic growth to proceed at the fastest possible noninflationary pace but not by one penny faster. The Centrobank's computer would monitor each recipient country's economy to see if inflationary or other strains were appearing, and would signal that Centrobank must cut off new supplies of artificially created foreign exchange if they did. Contemporary critics said in triple self-contradiction that (a) this scheme was so insulting to poor countries' governments 54 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobonk that few would agree to join it; (b) all poor countries would flock to eat at this trough and there would be an impossibly inflationary expansion of world money supply; and that (c) the anti-inflationary terms proffered from the international central bank were so tough that this would still allow only painfully slow economic depauperization. Now that the Centrobank has been in operation for nearly twenty years we know that the answer to (a) is that the government of any poor country that does not join Centrobank is likely to be booted out by its people; that the answer to (b) is that, despite this flood of countries into the scheme, newly created foreign exchange for poor countries has in only one year,2Ol3, exceeded 0.2 per cent of world-wide money supply (WM3); and that the answer to (c) is that progress proved remarkably fast, although that was partly because of the answers that emerged to the second set of questions posed in the next few programs. The second set of questions which arose after about the eighth program rested on what sorts of purchases should qualify for Centrobank payments. Originally the notion had been that the international Centrobank should open foreign exchange clearing accounts to finance non-inflationary purchases by any persons or any groups in qualifying poor countries. The stated aim was that a poor country should not be prevented merely by shortage of foreign exchange from pursuing the fastest possible rate of non-inflationary economic growth. But under the remorseless logic of the computer a bias was soon introduced in favor of financing purchases by citizens in poor countries rather than purchases by their governments.It became clear that projects by cost-disregarding governments in poor countries led more quickly to inflation than projects undertaken either (a) by penny-pinching native entrepreneurs (who began to apPear out of the woodwork in some profusion and in extraordinary places); or (b) by competing multinational corporations on new sorts of performance contracts. If you ask your TCs today, "What were the main evil con- 55 THE 2025 REPORT sequences of the colonial and immediate post-colonial periods in the poor two-thirds of the world?" two of the top answers will be: "The fact that an entrepreneurial class could not emerge as an important political constituency until the introduction of Centrobank after 200 5 :' and "The fact that until Centrobank no mechanism except uncompetitive government was put in place to meet many of the most urgent demands of the poorest three-quarters of the peopl e." Centrobank's solution to the first of these problems owed much to the proposals from Mr. Hu; its solution to the second problem owed much to the proposals from Mr.Heglund. Start with why Mr. Hu's proposals for encouraging entrepreneurs were so important. Growth had taken place in Europe and Japan and North America after 1850 because an entrepreneurial commercial class had become a dominant political influence, replacing the aristocracies in Europe and Japan and the mhlange misdescribed by de Tocqueville in North America. In the immediate post-colonial period in the poor countries circa 1960-2005 power fell instead into the hands of a new class of professional politicians , dt a time when they could temporarily do damaging things inconceivable for professional politicians before or (thank God) since. Their most damaging act was to set "political" instead of market prices. By statutory decree in many poor countries exchange rates and urban wages had been kept too high, food prices to farmers and prices for public utilities kept too low, credit had been allocated by rationin g at negative real interest rates, and imports had been rationed by licences that were immensely profitable to the politicians' brothers-in-law who were corruptly granted them. Even in 2005 every single computer program showed that living standards were increased, inflation brought down, and huppiness and efticiency advanced, when these policies were abandoned. So did every practical example. Call up on your TCs the practical example of Taiwan in the second half of the twentieth century; analysis of its success was the basis for Mr. Hu's proposals for Centrobank. Taiwan in 56 ,N -; .I, tII 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank 1950-2000 had multiplied its real income twentyfold and its dollar exports four-hundredfold because in the 1950s an invading warlord and his soldiers had been impelled by odd circumstances into laissez-faire economic policies against their will; and because Taiwan had thereafter been kept dynamically entrepreneurial largely because of nasty protectionism by rich countries against its exports. When in 1948 the armies of General Chiang Kai-shek fled from the Chinese mainland to Taiw&r, swelling its population overnight, they found an island which relied for over 90 per cent of its exports on rice and sugar. These were two commodities whose sales could not be greatly increased on world markets by dropping their international price. It therefore seemed natural to the incoming soldiers to follow the mistaken policies adopted by so many other authoritarian governments in poor countries all through 1950-2005. For a while they exploited the farmers by keeping internal farm prices too low and Taiwan's international exchange rate artificially high. The soldiers also granted cheap credits to themselves to set up manufacturing businesses. The results of such folly were the usual ones: food production and exports fell; inflation soared to three-digit figures; and foreign exchange holdings collapsed despite huge American aid. The soldiers met this by restricting imports further to protect their infant industries and their disappearing exchange reserves; this sent inflation even higher. As sugar and rice production used up much land in the overcrowded island, real estate prices in particular went through the roof. This economic mess was sadly typical of many newly independent countries at the time, but Taiwan was lucky in being newly dependent instead. General Chiang Kai-shek was at this time entirely dependent politically on the Americans, and he unwillingly agreed to propitiate them by accepting their good advice. He moved in the late 1950s pretty abruptly from the then usual developing-country wrong policies (low prices to farmers; protected home market for manufactures but overvalued exchange rate; subsidized interest rates) to the unfash- 57 THE 2025 REPORT ionable and precisely opposite right policies (market prices for farmers and market-determined exchange rates and interest rates; trade liberalization). The results exceeded all expectations. With its market-determined exchange rate, Taiwan found that its cheap-labor exports of umbrellas et cetera expanded smoothly-until foreign umbrella-makers objected to Taiwan's penetration of their domestic markets; then Taiwan's expansion in that particular product would abmptly stop. So Taiwan grew through its industrial miracle of 1955-2005 knowing that its businesses must find new products for new markets all the time, and that last year's successful firm would often have to close down this year. In consequence of its recognition that bureaucrats cannot know what will be profitable next minute, Taiwan subsidized only one thing apart from its over-large army: its tax and social nonwelfare policies were directed to raising savings from 5 per cent of national income in the 1950s to a Japan-beating 25 per cent in the 1980s. Mr. Hu recommended that the policies furthered by Centrobank in poor countries should be those that had "been furthered by accident in my country, Taiwan:' and he suggested some of the relevant software by which the Centrobank's computer model could put these incentives into effect. He was rather too inclined to argue that "anybody who does not follow these policies should not get Centrobank aid," but the process of ongoing computer analysis synthesized most of this into the messag€, "If you are following Taiwan-type polici€s, then the computer will allow a much higher level of internal expansion before it flashes the signal that inflation is being fostered so that further Centrobank creation for you must stop." As the coordinating Nobel laureate said when presenting Mr. Hu with one of the two gold medals: His software provided one of the two quantum leaps that turned Centrobank into a success. Although the 1955-2005 Taiwan-type policies hugely expanded national income, the pressure groups in favor of them are entrepreneurs who do 58 2005J; The Introduction of Centrobank not come into being until the policies have already been introduced. In most poor countries that have been following the old and opposite policies of import substitution and pricerigging, the political constituencies in favor of the old policies are by definition more powerful. This is a main reason why these old-fashioned countries remain poor. In some Latin American countries right-wing generals have periodically seized power, and put into effect policies that are supposed to be laissez-faire. But these generals generally have to rely for their political mandate on the few old families who already own big businesses in these countries. Even with the best will in the world (which these right-wing generals rarely have) they tend therefore to support and protect yesterday's big capitalists, rather than the grubby entrepreneurs in back rooms on whom growth most depends. Mr. Hu's proposals managed to make Centrobank's computer programs mirror the dependence on entrepreneurs created by historical accident in the 1950-2005 success stories of Japan (which ploughed through yesterday's powerful families in 1945 and had to rely on entrepreneurs thereafter), Singapore (which benefited from not having any farmers or mral classes to exploit), Hong Kong (which did not have any political constituencies, only entrepreneurs) and Taiwan. Although Mr. Hu was rightly decorated for "enabling Centrobank policies to speak with a Taiwanese accent," the later stages of the first computerized town meeting of the world were carried on more like one of today's many million computer conferences than like the original television network program in which Mr. Hu joined. People after about program fourteen did not put in their views instantly, but after some days' consideration and after checking with the database which showed what was the presumed best form for Centrobank at the moment. The computer still rejected the 99 per cent of proposals made to it that were nonsense; it still incorporated for ongoing analysis the less than 1 per cent of suggestions that seemed sensible and relevant; but it also now introduced a new cate- 59 THE 2025 REPORT gory. It picked up those contrary views that seemed plausibly sensible, but not suitable for the emerging form of Centrobank's consensus, and put proposers of such ideas in touch with people holding similar views around the world. From the views of this constructive opposition to "Hu plus 33,I79 people's telecommunicated and accepted improvements," one new consensus objection began to emerge. "f,Jnder the Taiwanese system," wrote one objector, "the main incentive to entrepreneurs in poor countries is to produce for fairly rich consumers, abroad or at home. If most of the seventy to eighty countries in the Centrobank scheme started exporting cheap-labor umbrellas as Taiwan did in the 1950s , a glut of umbrellas would rather soon appear. It would be better if new entrepreneurs could be encouraged to provide more of the things desperately needed by the poorest three-quarters of the people in these poor lands." How to do this? It was no good saying that poor countries should follow more egalitarian tax policies so as to direct more of their internal demand to things needed by their own poorest people. In the United States in the second half of the twentieth century, marginal tax rates generally took around one half of earned incomes above about six times gross national product per head. Even this only managed to reduce Gini coefficients, the best measure of wealth inequality, from something like 0.39 to something like 0.34. In Africa in 2000 GNP per head was around $500 a year. Any egalitarian tax policy which promised to halve all incomes above $3,000 a year would have (a) killed all initiative; (b) stirred politicians' brothers-in-law, civil servants and-most important-army officers (who got over $3,000 a year) into instant coups d'€tat Moreover, ro mechanisms existed in these countries to provide cheaply the complicated services the very poor needed most urgently. This was the problem that benefited from the proposals of Bjorn Heglund, who had long urged that the public services needed in his native North Sweden should be provided competitively by private entrepreneurs on performance contracts, along the lines of experiments which had been tried in the 1990s 60 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank by various worthy Swedish international aid organizations which "adopted" certain Third World villages. As was said at the presentation of Heglund's gold medal: We at Centrobank began to realize that poor countries could best grow richer by selling simple cheap-labor goods to the rich world-a process that did not involve them in using our proffered foreign exchange at all, although it had become possible only after they responded to Centrobank's initial incentives d la "Hu plus 33,179." The right way to use their new foreign exchange was often to provide mechanisms d la Heglund whereby Western firms are encouraged to make money by providing the services that the poorest three-quarters in the poor world most need. The time was ripe for this experiment, especially in such fields as medicine. The trend even in the West at this time was to new sorts of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), through which people paid performance fees to physicians and their assistants if they kept them pnd their families healthy. It was early decided to put the competitive services provided by multinational HMOs into the pool which would qualify for Centrobank payments. Sophisticated computer measurements of people's health were coming into fashion, and three young doctors just out of medical school at the University of Minneapolis drew the largest single Centrobank payment in 2009 when their HMO, resting heavily on telecommunicated X-rays and long-range computer analyses, plus quickly trained local paramedics and some helicopter- carried Western doctors on call, plus recommended dietary changes and some environmental changes which new staffs personally put into effect (cleaning wells, etc.), brought an extraordinary improvement in the health indices of people over a wide stretch of Africa's desperately poor Sahel. Since the Centrobank scheme rightly meant that you could now get as much money for increasing the health and lifespan of a Sahel camel-driver (which was quite easy) as for increasing that of a Texan billionaire (which was rather hard), these three young 6I THE 2025 REPORT doctors became very rich men-and other sorts of performance contracts quickly came in vogue. This revolution in attitudes and

Friday, December 20, 2024

Who's Intelligence Who -Nominations of whom Neumann Einstein Turing would value most

Web version of 2025report.com better than mobile but here are some of most exciting intelligence videos
(please turn mobile on its side)


AI Summit Japan 2024 Fireside Chat
November 2024
, Chairman and CEO, Softbank
, Founder, President and CEO, NVIDIA Corporation
Conversation with NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang and Softbank Group Corp. CEO Masayoshi Son to hear what's possible with AI and accelerated computing.
44:38
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang’s Special Address at AI Summit India

Gemini Chat 2025.1.1 
TO GEMINI












can you help me - i would like to help start up a fantasy league game "most valuable teacher in the woeld". Why: because who & when different people want to learn most from fascinates me; And whether there is a mooc or somethinbg so anyone can affordably learn (scale with concurrent alumni) from a chosen person matters- and of course if software world dies as we  race into AI agent world new questions arise-eg whose agent would you like access to? - is being able to access eg jensen huang's agent going to have same consrquence as acceess to jensen huang - and heaven forbid there's ever an accident to jensen but to make sure his unique legacy survives should design an agent be even more important to superintelligencers that other aspects of writing up a will - does this intro make sense and do you know if anyone is already doing this? - i dont want to reinvent the wheel.


58:36
AI and The Next Computing Platforms With Jensen Huang and Mark Zuckerberg
AI and The Next Computing Platforms With Jensen Huang and Mark Zuckerberg
August 2024
, Founder and CEO, Meta
, NVIDIA
NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang and Meta founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg discuss how fundamental research is enabling AI breakthroughs, and how generative AI and open-source software will empower developers and creators.
59:25
What’s Next in AI: NVIDIA’s Jensen Huang Talks With WIRED’s Lauren Goode
What’s Next in AI: NVIDIA’s Jensen Huang Talks With WIRED’s Lauren Goode
August 2024
, Sr. Writer, WIRED
, NVIDIA
In a talk at SIGGRAPH 2024, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang chats with WIRED Senior Writer Lauren Goode to explore accelerated computing, generative AI, and the breakthrough research that’s fueling the next wave of innovation, virtual worlds, and robotics.
01:49:19
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang Keynote at COMPUTEX 2024
NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang Keynote at COMPUTEX 2024
June 2024
, Founder and CEO, NVIDIA
Watch NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang deliver a live keynote address ahead of COMPUTEX 2024 on June 2 at 7 p.m. in Taipei, Taiwan, outlining what’s next for the AI ecosystem.
01:00:35
Replay – GTC Korean AI Expert Day
Replay – GTC Korean AI Expert Day
May 2024
, NVIDIA
, NVIDIA
, NVIDIA
NVIDIA experts were on hand to summarize the content of CEO Jensen Huang's GTC keynote, as well as share industry AI trends and digital twin best practices.
53:47
Transforming AI
Transforming AI
March 2024
, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Cohere
, Co-Founder and CEO, Essential AI
, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Inceptive
, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, NVIDIA
, Co-Founder, NEAR Protocol
, Co-Founder and Chief Technology Officer, Sakana AI
, Member of Technical Staff, OpenAI
, Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, Character.AI
Gomez, Lukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin, hosted by NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang.
49:08
Earth-2: Updates on kilometer-scale visualization, simulation, digital twinning, and AI super-resolution
Earth-2: Updates on kilometer-scale visualization, simulation, digital twinning, and AI super-resolution
March 2024
, Principal Engineer and Scientist, AI-HPC and Engineering Lead, Earth-2, NVIDIA
, Director of Climate Simulation Research, NVIDIA
In July 2023, NVIDIA’s CEO Jensen Huang announced at the Berlin Summit that three technological breakthroughs are needed to achieve Earth Virtualization Engines (EVE): (i) Simulating Earth’s climate at kilometer-scale; (ii) Using AI to emulate the physics of weather and climate from exabytes of data; (iii) Serving this wealth of information via …
02:03:08
GTC 2024 Keynote
GTC 2024 Keynote
March 2024
, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, NVIDIA
Don't miss this keynote from NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang. He'll share how NVIDIA's accelerated computing platform is driving the next wave in AI, digital twins, cloud technologies, and sustainable computing


NVIDIA GPU Technology Conference

OFF-AIR

GTC 2023 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

1 YEAR AGO  196 VIEWS

GTC Sept 2022 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

2 YEARS AGO  42 VIEWS

GTC 2022 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

2 YEARS AGO  1,102 VIEWS

GTC Nov 2021 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

3 YEARS AGO  516 VIEWS

GTC 2021 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

3 YEARS AGO  13,123 VIEWS

GTC DC 2019 Keynote with NVIDIA SVP Ian Buck

5 YEARS AGO  4,675 VIEWS

GTC 2019 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

5 YEARS AGO  160,055 VIEWS

GTC DC 2018 Keynote with Federal CIO Suzette Kent

6 YEARS AGO  16,785 VIEWS

GTC DC 2018 Keynote with NVIDIA VP Ian Buck

6 YEARS AGO  9,567 VIEWS

GTC Israel 2018 Keynote with NVIDIA Chief Scientist Bill Dally

6 YEARS AGO  17,444 VIEWS

GTC Europe 2018 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

6 YEARS AGO  24 VIEWS

GPU Europe 2017 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

7 YEARS AGO  76,319 VIEWS

GTC 2017 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

7 YEARS AGO  69,107 VIEWS

GTCx India 2016 Opening Keynote

8 YEARS AGO  72 VIEWS

GTC DC 2016 Panel, AI and Americas Future

8 YEARS AGO  244 VIEWS

GTC DC 2016 Keynote with Dr. France Cordova

8 YEARS AGO  115 VIEWS

GTC DC 2016 Keynote with Dr. Jerry Lee

8 YEARS AGO  3,035 VIEWS

GTC DC 2016 Keynote with Jason Furman

8 YEARS AGO  122 VIEWS

GTC DC 2016 Keynote with NVIDIA Chief Scientist Bill Daly

8 YEARS AGO  383 VIEWS

GTC Japan 2016 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

8 YEARS AGO  1,897 VIEWS

GTC Taiwan 2016 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

8 YEARS AGO  1,623 VIEWS

GTC Europe 2016 Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

8 YEARS AGO  5,283 VIEWS

GTC 2016 Keynote with Gill Pratt, CEO of Toyota Researc

8 YEARS AGO  359 VIEWS

GTC 2016 Keynote with Rob High, CTO of IBM Watson

8 YEARS AGO  617 VIEWS

GTC 2016 Opening Keynote with NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang

8 YEARS AGO  493 VIEWS

GTC 2015 Keynote with Dr. Andrew Ng, Baidu

9 YEARS AGO  51,913 VIEWS

GTC 2015 Keynote with Jeff Dean, Google

9 YEARS AGO  19,226 VIEWS

1950s Brain pretraining 21st c intelligence ER win-wiu-win mapping of NET's Legacy Neumann Einstein Turing:

in pretraining for 3 by million times more tech waves, Demand nedia/public servants loyal to decade future-back goals eg jfk space/satellite race/triad reconciliation eg iche bin ein berliner; peace corps

Always explore above zero sum games eg Kennedy's gameplay saves world from Khruschev

Safety of All three tech waves needs to prevent- engineers/mathematicians of boith energy and mediation becoming most hated but most nationally wanted of people-- these engineers should demand maxomosation of open source transparency if intelligence global-local economies are to include all

- end energy that confkixts with human energy (clean food,water) - either nuckear or  earth's abunfant renewablse, Expect ubtelligene enguneeruing to stimulate ever greater demands for energy transmission and borderless infrstructure as intergenrational investment.Trust multilateral: Plan ahead to prevent energy causing wars

Einstein with Gandhi, Freud & HBU stydents: transform education as action-learnung collaborations and helping eaxh other increase intelligence with new brain tools and worldwide networks

Unsderstand deep data- cultures; mother earth's climate and virus rules

Understand recursive curiosity posed by 3 dimensions of decolonial ai (see right)

 75% oi peoples may depend on pacific tradeb more than atlantuc trade; but there is still the isssue that north -south has caused 2 world wars out of euraisa and that the 2 min canals will make the 10% living south of equator poorest unless contients take responsibility north south- complicating this is tropical areas have most diseases (note all main monenrat capitals start north of tropics

nb many oil deposits are in desrets near equat9ir where lnd is worthless unless you own the oil well- how will such places emerge democracy and become smart enough before era of zero carbon- one southern mieacle solution bottom billion girls pyramid - see abed yunud grant barefoot medic movements across tropics as foundational to intel endi-ing extreme poverty as pathways to deep enough diversity of sov data to celebrate millenials beinf furst renewable gen everywhere

Wothin the first 5 years of the parting of Neumann Einstein Turong - 3 early leaders to follow areL

JFK; Prince Charke & UK Royals- Emperor Hirohito & Japan Royals


=====Big Idea Market Makinng

Jensen Huang's philosophy of focusing on **market-making** rather than competing in established markets aligns with creating entirely new opportunities and ecosystems. This approach often leads to **intergenerational progress**, as it fosters innovation that can redefine industries and improve quality of life for future generations. Here are some **market-making cases** that millennials and youth can celebrate as examples of intergenerational progress:

---

### **1. AI-Driven Healthcare and Personalized Medicine**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA's GPUs and AI platforms are enabling breakthroughs in healthcare, such as drug discovery, genomics, and personalized medicine. For example, AI models can analyze vast amounts of medical data to identify treatments tailored to individual patients.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: This technology has the potential to extend lifespans, improve quality of life, and reduce healthcare costs, benefiting both current and future generations.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Millennials and Gen Z are deeply interested in health and wellness, and they value innovations that democratize access to healthcare.

---

### **2. Climate Modeling and Sustainability Solutions**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA's work in climate modeling and weather forecasting is helping scientists better understand and mitigate the effects of climate change. For instance, AI-powered models can predict extreme weather events and optimize renewable energy systems.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: These efforts directly address the climate crisis, which is a top concern for younger generations. By enabling more accurate predictions and sustainable solutions, NVIDIA is contributing to a healthier planet for future generations.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Climate action is a defining issue for millennials and Gen Z, who are eager to celebrate technologies that combat environmental degradation.

---

### **3. Autonomous Vehicles and Smart Transportation**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA's DRIVE platform is at the forefront of autonomous vehicle technology, enabling safer, more efficient transportation systems. This includes self-driving cars, drones, and smart city infrastructure.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: Autonomous vehicles have the potential to reduce traffic accidents, lower emissions, and improve mobility for aging populations and people with disabilities.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Younger generations are less attached to car ownership and more open to shared, sustainable mobility solutions. They also value innovations that align with a tech-driven, connected lifestyle.

---

### **4. AI-Powered Education and Workforce Development**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA's AI tools are being used to create personalized learning platforms, virtual classrooms, and workforce training programs. These technologies can help bridge the skills gap and prepare workers for the jobs of the future.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: By democratizing access to education and upskilling opportunities, NVIDIA is helping to create a more equitable and adaptable workforce for future generations.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Millennials and Gen Z prioritize lifelong learning and career flexibility. They are likely to celebrate innovations that empower them to thrive in a rapidly changing economy.

---

### **5. Digital Twins and the Metaverse**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA's Omniverse platform enables the creation of **digital twins**—virtual replicas of physical systems—that can be used to optimize everything from manufacturing to urban planning. This technology is also foundational to the development of the metaverse.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: Digital twins can lead to more efficient resource use, reduced waste, and better-designed cities, benefiting future generations. The metaverse, meanwhile, has the potential to redefine how people work, learn, and socialize.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Younger generations are digital natives who are excited about immersive technologies and virtual worlds. They are likely to embrace innovations that blend the physical and digital realms.

---

### **6. Robotics and Automation**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA's robotics platforms, such as Isaac, are enabling the development of advanced robots for industries like manufacturing, healthcare, and agriculture. These robots can perform tasks that are dangerous, repetitive, or impossible for humans.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: Robotics and automation can improve productivity, reduce human exposure to hazardous conditions, and address labor shortages, creating a safer and more efficient world for future generations.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Millennials and Gen Z are fascinated by robotics and AI, and they appreciate innovations that enhance human capabilities and improve quality of life.

---

### **7. AI for Creative Industries**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA's AI tools are empowering creators in fields like gaming, film, and design. For example, AI can generate realistic graphics, streamline animation, and even assist in music composition.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: By lowering barriers to entry and expanding creative possibilities, NVIDIA is helping to cultivate a more vibrant and inclusive cultural landscape for future generations.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Younger generations are deeply engaged in creative expression and digital content creation. They are likely to celebrate technologies that amplify their creativity and enable new forms of storytelling.

---

### **8. Quantum Computing and Advanced Research**
   - **Market-Making Impact**: NVIDIA is investing in quantum computing simulations and other advanced research tools that could revolutionize fields like materials science, cryptography, and artificial intelligence.
   - **Intergenerational Progress**: These technologies have the potential to solve some of humanity's most complex problems, from developing new energy sources to curing diseases.
   - **Youth Appeal**: Millennials and Gen Z are drawn to cutting-edge science and technology. They are likely to celebrate innovations that push the boundaries of what is possible.

---

### **Why Millennials and Youth Should Celebrate These Innovations**
   - **Ownership of the Future**: These market-making efforts are shaping the world that younger generations will inherit. By celebrating these innovations, millennials and Gen Z can feel a sense of ownership and agency in driving progress.
   - **Alignment with Values**: These initiatives align with the values of younger generations, such as sustainability, equity, and innovation.
   - **Inspiration for Action**: Highlighting these successes can inspire young people to pursue careers in STEM, entrepreneurship, and social impact, further accelerating intergenerational progress.

---

### **Conclusion**
NVIDIA's market-making efforts in areas like AI-driven healthcare, climate modeling, autonomous vehicles, and the metaverse represent transformative innovations that millennials and youth can celebrate as intergenerational progress. These advancements not only address pressing global challenges but also create new opportunities for future generations to thrive. By focusing on these areas, NVIDIA is not just building technology—it's building a better future.
Posted by at

1 comment:

  1. chris macraeDecember 20, 2024 at 11:49 AM

    Source Von Neumann centenary celebration Grenwich University, speech Norman Macrae V Neumann Biographer
    When Khruschev put nuclear weapons into Cuba 1962, there were 3 possible courses of action for USA
    1 Do nothing- pretend not to notice them. Today we know from Open Soviet files that , if this happens, Khruschev aimed to absorb West Berlin and do other horrors behind the Iron Curtain because he saw that otherwise communism would collapse in the way that it has so far done.
    2 US bombs Cuba as the Chief of Air Staff recommended.This would have instigated protests and anti-American demos and riots round the world. Khruschev confided to his papers that he shoukd then be able to absorb West Berlin on a wave of Anti-American hate3 On the saddle point in a games theory matrix was blockade. This would provide ladders for Krischev to climb down, which he would then probably use to climb down and, in fact, did. Two Harvard professors in Kennedy's Camelot described this policy to Robert Kennedy in terms of game theory and that is quite possubly why we are all alive today.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)