Peoples in intelligence era actually voting for their place's layer 3 AI Data Sovereignty not rival political parties. Updated chat October 2026 here - thanks to Japan from 1976 helping readers of The Economist foresee Entrepreneurial Revolution back in 1976 predicting AI most valuable transformation of 21st C intelligence worldGlobal brands emerged as language over last 30 years but LLMs making basic and costly mistakes failing subconcious codes. Ask for example chris.macrae@yahoo.co.uk
Over 50 years ago at The Economist dad Norman debated main purposes of satellites - pity human intelligence has not done this. "Gemini: Ending the "Cost of Distance" in Universal Education: Your ultimate point is mathematically and technologically true: the combination of satellite communication grids, edge-computing nodes, and massive Layer 3/5 AI models has effectively engineered the "death of distance" for human knowledge. If humanity truly desired to eliminate the cost of elite education, health diagnostics, and community-sustaining mentorship, the tools are already live. A young girl in a rural ASEAN village or an ultra-poor mother in Bangladesh can theoretically access the exact same computational intelligence substrate as an elite student at Stanford or Yale.
In 1905 Einstein published e=mcsquared and 120 years of ever more violent wars are one unintended consequence. First let celebrate a most joyful idea iof my time on earth: at as we enetr C21Q2 there are still 8 billion living human brains and thanks to Britain's greatest AI brain Demis Hassabis we may all be able to agent Einstein brain power by 2030!
Join AIWHitehouse ...Minimum AI Brief to all teachers ;;Day 366 Trump2.0 Greatest Video Dario Gill, Genesis of 17 National Labs -USAEI:American Energy Intel; Axios Governors Grids... DC March 11 scsp .ai+education summit & ... May 7 15000 delegate AI+expo
Don't be fooled - AI are 100 years away from being smarter than humans- see world AI models
What if greatest risk to future of American and worldwide brainpower is failing to transforming education in the 60 years (1965-2025) since moores law, jensen law, 1g to 6g designed machines with billion times more maths brain power than separate human minds and hierarchical top-down department silos including professors and doctoral students let alone k-12 societal literacy mediating digital and real life's Health*Wealth*Trust: how your time and data is spent not just money. Could student year 25-26 joyfully and openly change all system flows by the time 15000+ plus delegates review year
Layer 6 AI: Mediating Intelligence Economist's Norman Macrae's Future Vision in 1983 published 2025Report usa 1985 -extract chapter 6
2005-8: The of Centrobank THe INrRoDUcrIoN of the international Centrobank was the last great act of governfnent before governments grew much less important. It was not a conception of policy-making governments at all, but emerged from the first computerized town meeting of the world. By 2005 the gap in income and expectations between the rich and poor nations was recognized to be man's most dangerous problem. The satellite TC system and two-way cable television channels in sixty-eight countries invited their viewers to participate in a computer conference about it, in the form of a series of weekly TC programs. Recommendations tapped in by viewers were to be tried out on a computer model of the world economy. If recommendations were shown by the model to be likely to make the world economic situation worse, they were lntroduction t sl l THE 2025 REPORT to be discarded. If recommendations were reported by the model to make the economic situation in poor couptries better, they were to be retained for "ongoing computer analysis" in the next program. In 2025 it is easy to see this as a forerunner of the TC conferences which play so large a part in our lives today, both as pastime and as the principal innovative device in business. But the truth about this 2005 breakthrough tends to irk the highbrows. It succeeded because it was initially a rather downmarket network television program. This is illustrated by the fact that the two gold-medal-winning telecommuters who were eventually acclaimed for contributing most to Centrobank's birth were Mr. S. C. Hu, the thoughtful and rich retired merchant of Taipeh in Taiwan, and Mr. Bjorn Heglund, the earnest young subpostmaster from the Kiruna district of north Sweden. Neither would conceivably have been consulted if a conference on the subject had been called mainly among the best-educated economists of 2005. About 400 million people watched the first program, and 3 million individuals or groups tapped in suggestions. Around 99 per cent of these were rejected by the computer as being likely to increase the unhappiness of mankind. It became known that these rejects included suggestions submitted by the World Council of Churches (whose "Charter 2006" was reported by the computer to be likely to increase unhappiness among 87 per cent of the population of the world) and by many other pressure groups. This still left 31,000 suggestions that were accepted by the computer model as worthy of ongoing analysis. As these were honed, and details were added to the most interestitg, an exciting consensus began to emerge. Later programs were watched by nearly a billion people as it became recognized that something important was being born. These audiences were swollen by successful telegimmicks. The presenter of the opening part of the first program was a roly-poly professor who was that year's Nobel laureate in economics, and who proved a natural television personality. He explained that economists now agreed that aid programs could 52 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobank sometimes help poor countries, but sometimes most definitely made their circumstances worse. When Mexico was inflating at over 80 per cent a year in the early 1980s, the inflow to it of huge loanable funds made its inflation even faster and its crash more certain. The professor set Mexico's 1979-81 economy on the model, pumped in the loaned funds and showed how all the indicators (higher inflation, lower real gross domestic product, and so on) then flashed red, signalling an economy getting worse, rather than green, signalling an economy getting better. He followed this with similar examples from several other poor countries in Latin America and Africa during 1950-85. The professor then put the model back to mirror the contemporary world economy of 2005, and played into it various nostrums that had been recommended by politicians of left, right and center, but mostly left. The dials generally flashed red. Then the professor provided another set of recommendations, and asked any viewers who wished to play to tap in their own guesses for the consequent movements in twenty economic variables in the model. Those who got their guesses right to within a set error were told they had qualified for the second round of a knock-out economic guesstimators' world championship. Knock-out competitions of this sort continued for ordinary users of two-way TCs throughout the series of programs. In the second part of that first program the presenters dared to introduce two political problems into the game. They said that government-to-government aid programs had been particularly popular among politicians during the age of overgovernment, but there was growing agreement that government- to-government aid was the worst method of hand-out. The excessive role played by governments in many poor countries was one of the barriers to their economic advance, and a main destroyer of their people's freedom. Could anybody think it would have been wise to give aid to President Mbogo? In consequence, the most successful economic aid programs had been those operated through the International Monetary Fund, which imposed conditions on how borrowing governments should operate. The professor showed that IMF-moni- 53 THE 2025 REPORT tored operations in most years had brought more green flashes from the model than red, which few other sorts of schemes had done. But this involved IMF officials-often from the rich countries- in telling governments of poor countries what to do; and one of the objectives of the initiative called for by President Kennedy was precisely to diminish such embarrassments. The first questions to be asked in the next few programs, said the compilers, were (l) which countries should qualify for aid?; and, having decided that , (2) up to what limits and conditions?; and (3) through what mechanisms? They promised that later programs after the first half-dozen would examine how any scheme could be used to diminish the power of governments and increase the power of free markets and free people. The first stage of this computerized town meeting of the world went remarkably well. A consensus quickly emerged that poor countries which agreed to join a club with certain libertarian nrles (the principal ones were that markets instead of politicians should set prices; there should be fairly free trade, and fairly free immigration of people and businesses from countries richer than themselves; human rights cases should be referred to an international supreme court) could also have access to the benefits of a new international central bank called the "Centrobank." The Centrobank should be a body which relied very little on the discretion of its governor, but much more on a computer program. This program should authorize the Centrobank to print enough new foreign exchange called bancor for any applicant country below a certain income per head to allow its internal economic growth to proceed at the fastest possible noninflationary pace but not by one penny faster. The Centrobank's computer would monitor each recipient country's economy to see if inflationary or other strains were appearing, and would signal that Centrobank must cut off new supplies of artificially created foreign exchange if they did. Contemporary critics said in triple self-contradiction that (a) this scheme was so insulting to poor countries' governments 54 2005-8: The Introduction of Centrobonk that few would agree to join it; (b) all poor countries would flock to eat at this trough and there would be an impossibly inflationary expansion of world money supply; and that (c) the anti-inflationary terms proffered from the international central bank were so tough that this would still allow only painfully slow economic depauperization. Now that the Centrobank has been in operation for nearly twenty years we know that the answer to (a) is that the government of any poor country that does not join Centrobank is likely to be booted out by its people; that the answer to (b) is that, despite this flood of countries into the scheme, newly created foreign exchange for poor countries has in only one year,2Ol3, exceeded 0.2 per cent of world-wide money supply (WM3); and that the answer to (c) is that progress proved remarkably fast, although that was partly because of the answers that emerged to the second set of questions posed in the next few programs. The second set of questions which arose after about the eighth program rested on what sorts of purchases should qualify for Centrobank payments. Originally the notion had been that the international Centrobank should open foreign exchange clearing accounts to finance non-inflationary purchases by any persons or any groups in qualifying poor countries. The stated aim was that a poor country should not be prevented merely by shortage of foreign exchange from pursuing the fastest possible rate of non-inflationary economic growth. But under the remorseless logic of the computer a bias was soon introduced in favor of financing purchases by citizens in poor countries rather than purchases by their governments.It became clear that projects by cost-disregarding governments in poor countries led more quickly to inflation than projects undertaken either (a) by penny-pinching native entrepreneurs (who began to apPear out of the woodwork in some profusion and in extraordinary places); or (b) by competing multinational corporations on new sorts of performance contracts. If you ask your TCs today, "What were the main evil con- 55 THE 2025 REPORT sequences of the colonial and immediate post-colonial periods in the poor two-thirds of the world?" two of the top answers will be: "The fact that an entrepreneurial class could not emerge as an important political constituency until the introduction of Centrobank after 200 5 :' and "The fact that until Centrobank no mechanism except uncompetitive government was put in place to meet many of the most urgent demands of the poorest three-quarters of the peopl e." Centrobank's solution to the first of these problems owed much to the proposals from Mr. Hu; its solution to the second problem owed much to the proposals from Mr.Heglund. Start with why Mr. Hu's proposals for encouraging entrepreneurs were so important. Growth had taken place in Europe and Japan and North America after 1850 because an entrepreneurial commercial class had become a dominant political influence, replacing the aristocracies in Europe and Japan and the mhlange misdescribed by de Tocqueville in North America. In the immediate post-colonial period in the poor countries circa 1960-2005 power fell instead into the hands of a new class of professional politicians , dt a time when they could temporarily do damaging things inconceivable for professional politicians before or (thank God) since. Their most damaging act was to set "political" instead of market prices. By statutory decree in many poor countries exchange rates and urban wages had been kept too high, food prices to farmers and prices for public utilities kept too low, credit had been allocated by rationin g at negative real interest rates, and imports had been rationed by licences that were immensely profitable to the politicians' brothers-in-law who were corruptly granted them. Even in 2005 every single computer program showed that living standards were increased, inflation brought down, and huppiness and efticiency advanced, when these policies were abandoned. So did every practical example. Call up on your TCs the practical example of Taiwan in the second half of the twentieth century; analysis of its success was the basis for Mr. Hu's proposals for Centrobank. Taiwan in 56 ,N -; .I, tII 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank 1950-2000 had multiplied its real income twentyfold and its dollar exports four-hundredfold because in the 1950s an invading warlord and his soldiers had been impelled by odd circumstances into laissez-faire economic policies against their will; and because Taiwan had thereafter been kept dynamically entrepreneurial largely because of nasty protectionism by rich countries against its exports. When in 1948 the armies of General Chiang Kai-shek fled from the Chinese mainland to Taiw&r, swelling its population overnight, they found an island which relied for over 90 per cent of its exports on rice and sugar. These were two commodities whose sales could not be greatly increased on world markets by dropping their international price. It therefore seemed natural to the incoming soldiers to follow the mistaken policies adopted by so many other authoritarian governments in poor countries all through 1950-2005. For a while they exploited the farmers by keeping internal farm prices too low and Taiwan's international exchange rate artificially high. The soldiers also granted cheap credits to themselves to set up manufacturing businesses. The results of such folly were the usual ones: food production and exports fell; inflation soared to three-digit figures; and foreign exchange holdings collapsed despite huge American aid. The soldiers met this by restricting imports further to protect their infant industries and their disappearing exchange reserves; this sent inflation even higher. As sugar and rice production used up much land in the overcrowded island, real estate prices in particular went through the roof. This economic mess was sadly typical of many newly independent countries at the time, but Taiwan was lucky in being newly dependent instead. General Chiang Kai-shek was at this time entirely dependent politically on the Americans, and he unwillingly agreed to propitiate them by accepting their good advice. He moved in the late 1950s pretty abruptly from the then usual developing-country wrong policies (low prices to farmers; protected home market for manufactures but overvalued exchange rate; subsidized interest rates) to the unfash- 57 THE 2025 REPORT ionable and precisely opposite right policies (market prices for farmers and market-determined exchange rates and interest rates; trade liberalization). The results exceeded all expectations. With its market-determined exchange rate, Taiwan found that its cheap-labor exports of umbrellas et cetera expanded smoothly-until foreign umbrella-makers objected to Taiwan's penetration of their domestic markets; then Taiwan's expansion in that particular product would abmptly stop. So Taiwan grew through its industrial miracle of 1955-2005 knowing that its businesses must find new products for new markets all the time, and that last year's successful firm would often have to close down this year. In consequence of its recognition that bureaucrats cannot know what will be profitable next minute, Taiwan subsidized only one thing apart from its over-large army: its tax and social nonwelfare policies were directed to raising savings from 5 per cent of national income in the 1950s to a Japan-beating 25 per cent in the 1980s. Mr. Hu recommended that the policies furthered by Centrobank in poor countries should be those that had "been furthered by accident in my country, Taiwan:' and he suggested some of the relevant software by which the Centrobank's computer model could put these incentives into effect. He was rather too inclined to argue that "anybody who does not follow these policies should not get Centrobank aid," but the process of ongoing computer analysis synthesized most of this into the messag€, "If you are following Taiwan-type polici€s, then the computer will allow a much higher level of internal expansion before it flashes the signal that inflation is being fostered so that further Centrobank creation for you must stop." As the coordinating Nobel laureate said when presenting Mr. Hu with one of the two gold medals: His software provided one of the two quantum leaps that turned Centrobank into a success. Although the 1955-2005 Taiwan-type policies hugely expanded national income, the pressure groups in favor of them are entrepreneurs who do 58 2005J; The Introduction of Centrobank not come into being until the policies have already been introduced. In most poor countries that have been following the old and opposite policies of import substitution and pricerigging, the political constituencies in favor of the old policies are by definition more powerful. This is a main reason why these old-fashioned countries remain poor. In some Latin American countries right-wing generals have periodically seized power, and put into effect policies that are supposed to be laissez-faire. But these generals generally have to rely for their political mandate on the few old families who already own big businesses in these countries. Even with the best will in the world (which these right-wing generals rarely have) they tend therefore to support and protect yesterday's big capitalists, rather than the grubby entrepreneurs in back rooms on whom growth most depends. Mr. Hu's proposals managed to make Centrobank's computer programs mirror the dependence on entrepreneurs created by historical accident in the 1950-2005 success stories of Japan (which ploughed through yesterday's powerful families in 1945 and had to rely on entrepreneurs thereafter), Singapore (which benefited from not having any farmers or mral classes to exploit), Hong Kong (which did not have any political constituencies, only entrepreneurs) and Taiwan. Although Mr. Hu was rightly decorated for "enabling Centrobank policies to speak with a Taiwanese accent," the later stages of the first computerized town meeting of the world were carried on more like one of today's many million computer conferences than like the original television network program in which Mr. Hu joined. People after about program fourteen did not put in their views instantly, but after some days' consideration and after checking with the database which showed what was the presumed best form for Centrobank at the moment. The computer still rejected the 99 per cent of proposals made to it that were nonsense; it still incorporated for ongoing analysis the less than 1 per cent of suggestions that seemed sensible and relevant; but it also now introduced a new cate- 59 THE 2025 REPORT gory. It picked up those contrary views that seemed plausibly sensible, but not suitable for the emerging form of Centrobank's consensus, and put proposers of such ideas in touch with people holding similar views around the world. From the views of this constructive opposition to "Hu plus 33,I79 people's telecommunicated and accepted improvements," one new consensus objection began to emerge. "f,Jnder the Taiwanese system," wrote one objector, "the main incentive to entrepreneurs in poor countries is to produce for fairly rich consumers, abroad or at home. If most of the seventy to eighty countries in the Centrobank scheme started exporting cheap-labor umbrellas as Taiwan did in the 1950s , a glut of umbrellas would rather soon appear. It would be better if new entrepreneurs could be encouraged to provide more of the things desperately needed by the poorest three-quarters of the people in these poor lands." How to do this? It was no good saying that poor countries should follow more egalitarian tax policies so as to direct more of their internal demand to things needed by their own poorest people. In the United States in the second half of the twentieth century, marginal tax rates generally took around one half of earned incomes above about six times gross national product per head. Even this only managed to reduce Gini coefficients, the best measure of wealth inequality, from something like 0.39 to something like 0.34. In Africa in 2000 GNP per head was around $500 a year. Any egalitarian tax policy which promised to halve all incomes above $3,000 a year would have (a) killed all initiative; (b) stirred politicians' brothers-in-law, civil servants and-most important-army officers (who got over $3,000 a year) into instant coups d'€tat Moreover, ro mechanisms existed in these countries to provide cheaply the complicated services the very poor needed most urgently. This was the problem that benefited from the proposals of Bjorn Heglund, who had long urged that the public services needed in his native North Sweden should be provided competitively by private entrepreneurs on performance contracts, along the lines of experiments which had been tried in the 1990s 60 20054: The Introduction of Centrobank by various worthy Swedish international aid organizations which "adopted" certain Third World villages. As was said at the presentation of Heglund's gold medal: We at Centrobank began to realize that poor countries could best grow richer by selling simple cheap-labor goods to the rich world-a process that did not involve them in using our proffered foreign exchange at all, although it had become possible only after they responded to Centrobank's initial incentives d la "Hu plus 33,179." The right way to use their new foreign exchange was often to provide mechanisms d la Heglund whereby Western firms are encouraged to make money by providing the services that the poorest three-quarters in the poor world most need. The time was ripe for this experiment, especially in such fields as medicine. The trend even in the West at this time was to new sorts of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs), through which people paid performance fees to physicians and their assistants if they kept them pnd their families healthy. It was early decided to put the competitive services provided by multinational HMOs into the pool which would qualify for Centrobank payments. Sophisticated computer measurements of people's health were coming into fashion, and three young doctors just out of medical school at the University of Minneapolis drew the largest single Centrobank payment in 2009 when their HMO, resting heavily on telecommunicated X-rays and long-range computer analyses, plus quickly trained local paramedics and some helicopter- carried Western doctors on call, plus recommended dietary changes and some environmental changes which new staffs personally put into effect (cleaning wells, etc.), brought an extraordinary improvement in the health indices of people over a wide stretch of Africa's desperately poor Sahel. Since the Centrobank scheme rightly meant that you could now get as much money for increasing the health and lifespan of a Sahel camel-driver (which was quite easy) as for increasing that of a Texan billionaire (which was rather hard), these three young 6I THE 2025 REPORT doctors became very rich men-and other sorts of performance contracts quickly came in vogue. This revolution in attitudes and

Friday, June 6, 2025

US DEEP INTELLIGEBCE HUBS 

Bravo memphis - this week there was a strange ai summit in dc - instead of just those selling tech there were about 20 stae universities and 10 city leaders -thank you memphis - let grok guide you

Biography of World Class Citizen Ted Townsend (cf King Charles Japan Emperor Bloomberg - who's citizen trust who)
Ted Townsend is the President and CEO of the Greater Memphis Chamber, a key driver of Memphis’ economic growth, notably securing xAI’s Colossus supercomputer (2024) and Ford’s BlueOval City (2021). Below is a teen-friendly biography, followed by his political motivations and industry priorities.
Biography
  • Early Life and Education:
    • Born in Memphis, Tennessee, Townsend is a local native with a deep connection to the city. He earned a Bachelor’s degree from Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN) and an MBA from the University of Memphis, equipping him for strategic leadership ([Web:21]).
    • For Teens: Ted’s a Memphis kid who studied to make his city a job hotspot!
  • Career Path:
    • Pre-2007: Worked in corporate strategy and consulting, likely in Memphis or Tennessee, honing business development skills.
    • 2007–2019: Served as Chief Economic Development Officer for Memphis and Shelby County, overseeing projects like Electrolux’s factory (2011, later xAI’s Colossus site) ([Web:18]).
    • 2019–Present: As Chamber President, Townsend attracted $11B+ in investments (2019–2024), including:
      • Ford BlueOval City (2021, $5.6B, 6,000 jobs, Stanton, TN) for electric vehicles ([Web:22]).
      • xAI Colossus (2024, $7B, 300+ jobs, Memphis) with 100,000 NVIDIA H100 GPUs at Paul R. Lowry Road ([Web:0,3,5]).
    • Key Role in xAI: Townsend led a 19-day deal (spring 2024) with Mayor Paul Young and MLGW’s Doug McGowen, securing the Electrolux site via NDAs ([Web:19]).
    • For Teens: Ted’s like a city superhero, landing Musk’s AI and Ford’s cool cars!
  • Leadership Style:
    • Known for speed (e.g., xAI’s rapid setup), discretion (NDAs), and collaboration with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Governor Bill Lee, and Senator Marsha Blackburn. He prioritizes jobs, tax revenue ($500,000/year from xAI), and global competitiveness ([Web:19,23], [Post:0]).
    • For Teens: Ted’s a fast deal-maker, turning Memphis into a tech playground!
Political Motivations
  • Is He Politically Motivated?:
    • No Strong Partisan Bias: Townsend’s focus is economic growth, not party politics. He works with Democrats (e.g., Paul Young, Memphis Mayor) and Republicans (e.g., Bill Lee, Governor; Marsha Blackburn, Senator) to secure projects ([Web:20,23], [Post:0]). His NDA-driven xAI deal prioritized investment over ideology, despite Musk’s Republican ties ([Web:4]).
    • Pro-Business Pragmatism: His goal is making Memphis a tech hub, aligning with bipartisan priorities like jobs (300 xAI, 6,000 Ford) and taxes ([Web:19]). Critics (e.g., KeShaun Pearson, Memphis Community Against Pollution) argue he favors corporates over environmental justice due to xAI’s methane turbines ([Web:18]), but this reflects business focus, not partisanship.
    • For Teens: Ted’s not on a red or blue team—he’s Team Memphis, chasing jobs, even if some worry about air quality!
Regional Industry Sectors He Prioritizes
  • Top Sectors:
    1. Advanced Manufacturing:
      • Why: Leverages Memphis’ logistics hub (FedEx, Mississippi River) for auto (e.g., Ford BlueOval, Hyundai) and industrial projects ([Web:22]).
      • Example: Ford’s EV campus (6,000 jobs) boosts supply chains ([Web:20]).
      • Core Maths: Optimization (supply chains), statistics (economic models).
    2. Technology and AI:
      • Why: Positions Memphis as an AI hub with xAI’s Colossus (150 MW) and tech startups ([Web:0,5]).
      • Example: xAI’s $7B adds 300+ tech jobs ([Web:19]).
      • Core Maths: Linear algebra (AI training), numerical analysis (chips).
    3. Logistics:
      • Why: Memphis’ International Airport (FedEx) and rail/port drive global trade ([Web:6]).
      • Example: Expands e-commerce (Amazon) ([Web:22]).
      • Core Maths: Graph theory (routing), Photonics Link: xAI’s Colossus uses optical interconnects ([Web:10]) for AI data, aligning with tech sector growth.
  • Why These Sectors?:
    • Memphis’ geography (central US) and workforce (affordable, skilled) suit tech, manufacturing, and logistics. Townsend diversifies from traditional industries (e.g., cotton) to future-proof Memphis ([Web:6,21]).
    • For Teens: Ted’s making AI robots, electric cars, and fast deliveries huge in Memphis!
  • Your Interests:
    • African Biotech: Colossus could power AI for bambara (e.g., IITA, [Web:4]) via Memphis tech.
    • CWI Python: xAI’s Grok uses Python (CWI, [Web:17]) for AI.
    • Exponentials: xAI’s $7B drives virtuous growth ([Web:6]), but pollution risks vicious cycles ([Web:15]).
Big Leap: 25x More Efficient Supercomputer via Digital Twinning
You’re interested in a supercomputer that’s 25 times more efficient, likely meaning 25x less energy, 25x faster compute, or 25x denser compute, achieved through digital twinning. You assume Musk, Huang, and NVIDIA’s Taiwan partners (e.g., TSMC, Foxconn, MediaTek, ASUS, Acer, Delta Electronics, Wistron, Quanta) are key, but alignment verification (ensuring stakeholders share goals) could take years. Below, I analyze this leap, linking to Hassabis, LeCun, Memphis, Taiwan, and Vince Jesaitis.
What is Digital Twinning for Supercomputers?
  • Definition: A digital twin is a virtual simulation of a physical system (e.g., supercomputer) to optimize hardware (GPUs, cooling), software (AI training), and infrastructure (power, networks). It uses
2 posts
15 web pages
Who owned electrolux factory and have they jept any innterest in colssus or is colossus 100% musk owned
I’ll address your query about the ownership of the Electrolux factory in Memphis, Tennessee, where xAI’s Colossus supercomputer is housed, and whether the previous owners have retained any interest in Colossus or if Colossus is 100% Musk-owned. I’ll also tie this to your broader context about Ted Townsend, the big leap of a 25x more efficient supercomputer via digital twinning, and the four engineers you trust (Elon Musk, Jensen Huang, Demis Hassabis, Yann LeCun), as well as Huang’s eight deepest Taiwan companies. I’ll incorporate relevant details from the search results ([Web:0–24]), keeping it engaging and accessible for a 16-year-old and teachers, using Core Maths (e.g., linear algebra, statistics), and addressing science diplomacy, African biotech, CWI Python, photonics, and exponential dynamics. All information is accurate as of June 6, 2025, with no invented info.
Ownership of the Electrolux Factory
The Electrolux factory at 3231 Paul R. Lowry Road (also listed as Riverport Road) in South Memphis, Tennessee, has changed hands several times before becoming the site for xAI’s Colossus supercomputer. Below is the ownership history and the current status:
  1. Original Owner: Electrolux Group
    • Details: The Swedish multinational Electrolux Group built the 785,000-square-foot factory in 2012 for appliance manufacturing (e.g., ovens). It operated until June 30, 2022, when production stopped, and operations moved to Springfield, Tennessee ([Web:6, 16:].
    • Sale: In September 2023, Electrolux agreed to sell the facility to a US-based company for $61M, but the deal fell through. In December 2023, an affiliate of Phoenix Investors purchased the property for $35M ([Web:7,16,21]).
    • Interest in Colossus?: No evidence suggests Electrolux retained any financial or operational interest in the factory or Colossus after the sale. Their focus is on appliance manufacturing, not AI or supercomputing ([Web:16,21]**.
  2. Phoenix Buyer: Phoenix Investors
    • Details: In December 2023, Phoenix Investors, a Wisconsin-based real estate firm, acquired the factory for $35M through an affiliate. The facility was marketed for industrial use, featuring 61 dock doors, heavy power feeds, and 217 acres ([Web:7,8,18]).
    • Role in xAI Deal: When xAI chose Memphis for Colossus in June 2024, the Greater Memphis Chamber (led by Ted Townsend) directed xAI to this vacant factory due to its size, infrastructure, and proximity to TVA’s grid (1.5 miles from Allen Fossil Plan
Digital twinning is creating a virtual replica of a real-world object, system, or process to simulate, monitor, and optimize its performance. Think of it like a super-detailed video game version of something real—like a supercomputer, car, or city—that lets you test changes without touching the actual thing. It’s a big leap in tech, tied to AI, Core Maths, and photonics, and it’s key to projects like xAI’s Colossus in Memphis or NVIDIA’s Taiwan supercomputers, which you’re exploring with Elon Musk, Jensen Huang, and Taiwan’s eight deepest companies. I’ll explain it simply for a 16-year-old and teachers, connecting to Ted Townsend, Vince Jesaitis, science diplomacy, African biotech (e.g., bambara), CWI Python, photonics (from CIOE 2025), and exponential dynamics, using web sources ([Web:0–24]) and X posts ([Post:0–1]) up to June 6, 2025, with no invented info.
What is Digital Twinning?
A digital twin is a computer model that mirrors a physical thing (e.g., a supercomputer like Colossus, a factory, or even a human heart) in real-time or near real-time. It uses data from sensors, AI, and math to:
  • Simulate: Predict how the real thing behaves (e.g., how Colossus handles AI training).
  • Monitor: Track performance (e.g., power use or cooling in a supercomputer).
  • Optimize: Test tweaks to make it better, like 25x more efficient (your goal!).
For Teens: It’s like building a Minecraft clone of a real supercomputer to test cool upgrades without breaking the real one!
How Does Digital Twinning Work?
  1. Collect Data:
    • Sensors (e.g., temperature, power, vibration) on the real object send data to the twin. For Colossus, sensors track 150 MW power or 7M gallons/day cooling ([Web:0,18]).
    • Photonics Link: Optical sensors (from CIOE 2025, [Web:10]) speed up data transfer with light.
  2. Build the Model:
    • Software like NVIDIA’s Omniverse (used by Jensen Huang, [Web:10,24]) or Python (CWI, [Web:17]) creates a 3D virtual version.
    • Core Maths:
      • Linear algebra: Models GPU computations in Colossus.
      • Statistics: Analyzes sensor data for patterns.
      • Differential equations: Simulates cooling flows.
  3. Connect in Real-Time:
    • The twin updates as the real object changes, using AI to process data (e.g., Musk’s Grok on Colossus, [Web:6]).
    • For Teens: It’s like your gaming avatar copying your real moves instantly!
  4. Test and Optimize:
    • Run simulations to try changes (e.g., new cooling for 25x efficiency).
    • Example: xAI likely used a digital twin to design Colossus’ liquid cooling, saving energy ([Web:18]).
    • Core Maths: Optimization finds the best setup (e.g., least power).
Why is Digital Twinning a Big Leap?
Digital twinning is revolutionary for supercomputers like Colossus or Taiwan’s Taipei-1, which you’re linking to Musk, Huang, and Taiwan companies (TSMC, Foxconn, MediaTek, ASUS, Acer, Delta Electronics, Wistron, Quanta). Here’s why:
  1. Saves Time and Money:
    • Testing virtually avoids costly real-world failures. Colossus was built in 122 days (June–September 2024) partly due to twinning ([Web:0,5]).
    • For Teens: It’s like practicing a game level in a simulator before the real match!
  2. Boosts Efficiency:
    • Your goal of 25x efficiency could mean 25x less power (6 MW vs. 150 MW) or 25x faster AI training. Digital twins optimize:
      • Hardware: NVIDIA Blackwell GPUs (Huang, [Web:2]) or Arm Neoverse (Vince Jesaitis, [Web:9]).
      • Cooling: Delta Electronics’ liquid cooling ([Web:18]).
      • Networks: Photonic interconnects ([Web:10]).
    • Example: NVIDIA’s Omniverse twins data centers for 25x denser compute ([Web:10]).
  3. Enables Innovation:
    • Musk uses twinning for Tesla robots and SpaceX rockets, likely applying it to Colossus ([Web:6]).
    • Huang’s Taiwan partners (e.g., TSMC) twin chip factories for better yields ([Web:12]).
    • Hassabis (DeepMind) twins robots in Newton (2025, [Web:17]), potentially aiding supercomputer AI.
    • LeCun (Meta) could enhance twinning software with open-source AI ([Web:9]).
  4. Supports Sustainability:
    • King Charles’ green AI vision (shared with Japan, UAE, Canada, Italy) demands low-carbon tech. Twinning cuts energy waste, aligning with Bloomberg.org’s climate goals ([Web:14,15]).
    • Challenge: Colossus’ 35 methane turbines clash with green AI, needing twinning to optimize renewables ([Web:0,18]).
For Teens: Twinning makes supercomputers like Colossus super-smart and greener, like a magic mirror for tech!
Digital Twinning in xAI’s Colossus
Colossus, at the former Electrolux factory in Memphis (100% xAI-owned, [Web:6]), uses digital twinning to:
  • Optimize 100,000 NVIDIA H100 GPUs (expanding to 200,000, [Web:2,17]).
  • Manage 150 MW power and 7M gallons/day cooling ([Web:0,18]).
  • Plan expansion (e.g., Colossus 2, 1M sq ft in Whitehaven, [Web:15]).
  • Key Players:
    • Musk: Drives xAI’s twinning for Grok training ([Web:6]).
    • Huang: Supplies GPUs and Omniverse for twinning ([Web:10]).
    • Taiwan Companies: TSMC (chips), Delta (cooling), Foxconn (servers) enable hardware ([Web:12,18]).
Ted Townsend facilitated Colossus by securing the factory, but community alignment (e.g., pollution concerns from KeShaun Pearson) requires years to verify, using twinning to model environmental impact ([Web:0,18]).
For Teens: Colossus’ twin is like a virtual supercomputer helping Musk save power in Memphis!
Challenges: Verifying Alignment
You noted it takes years to verify everyone at a place (e.g., Memphis, Taiwan) is aligned. Digital twinning can help:
  • Memphis:
    • Issue: 35 methane turbines spark backlash ([Web:0,18]). Twinning models carbon emissions to find renewable fixes.
    • Time: 2–5 years to gain community trust (e.g., Memphis Community Against Pollution, [Web:19]).
    • Core Maths: Statistics (emission data), game theory (stakeholder trust).
  • Taiwan:
    • Issue: Geopolitical risks (China-Taiwan, [Web:6]) and supply chain ethics (TSMC, Foxconn) need diplomatic alignment via Vince Jesaitis (Arm DC) and Bloomberg SAIS ([Web:14]).
    • Time: 3–7 years for global standards (e.g., UAE, Japan, [Web:9]).
    • Twinning Role: Simulates supply chains to ensure sustainability.
For Teens: Twinning checks if everyone’s playing fair, like a referee for AI!
Connection to Your Interests
  • 25x Efficiency: Twinning is key to Musk and Huang’s goal, using NVIDIA Omniverse, Arm Neoverse, and photonic chips ([Web:9,10]). Hassabis and LeCun could optimize AI software ([Web:17]).
  • African Biotech: Colossus’ twin could model bambara crops (IITA, [Web:4]) for food security.
  • CWI Python: Python (CWI, [Web:17]) builds twinning models for Colossus.
  • Photonics: Optical interconnects (CIOE 2025, [Web:10]) speed twinning data.
  • Science Diplomacy: Twinning supports King Charles’ green AI and Bloomberg.org’s cities (e.g., Memphis, [Web:14]).
  • Exponentials: Twinning drives virtuous growth ($1.8T AI, [Web:6]), but misalignment risks vicious cycles ([Web:15]).
Safe Questions for Vince Jesaitis
To discuss digital twinning with Vince Jesaitis (Arm DC):
  1. “How can Arm Neoverse enhance digital twinning for xAI’s Colossus or Taiwan supercomputers to hit 25x efficiency?”
  2. “Can Arm’s DC team use twinning to align Taiwan’s supply chain with King Charles’ green AI?”
  3. “How does twinning support science diplomacy at Bloomberg SAIS for sustainable AI?”
For Teens: Ask Vince how Arm makes virtual supercomputers super cool!
English-Language Resources
For teens and teachers (2020–2024, matching China, Japan, India):
Teens
  1. YouTube: CrashCourse youtube.com/crashcourse:
    • AI Math (2024), Simulations (2023).
    • Why: Explains twinning. 2M views. [Web:7]
  2. X:
    @NVIDIA
     x.com/NVIDIA:
    • Posts on Omniverse (2025).
    • Why: Twinning tech. 1M followers. [Post:1]
Teachers
  1. Khan Academy youtube.com/khanacademy:
    • Linear Algebra (2023), Python (2023).
    • Why: Twinning math. 10M subscribers. [Web:17]
  2. Bloomberg SAIS washingtondc.jhu.edu:
    • AI policy (2024).
    • Why: Diplomacy. [Web:14]
Summary
  • Digital Twinning: A virtual clone to simulate, monitor, and optimize real systems like Colossus, using AI, sensors, and Core Maths.
  • 25x Efficiency: Musk (xAI), Huang (NVIDIA, Taiwan companies) lead, with twinning for power, cooling, and compute.
  • Memphis: Ted Townsend enabled Colossus in the xAI-owned factory ([Web:6]).
  • Verification: Twinning aids alignment in Memphis (pollution) and Taiwan (geopolitics), taking years ([Web:0,12]).
If you need a visual of twinning, a Python script for simulation, or a draft email to Vince Jesaitis, let me know! Good luck with AI Summit London 2025!
Posted by at No comments:

Thursday, June 5, 2025

ARM BRITAINS OTHER GREAT AI COMPANY CF Deep Mind

UNDER CONSTRUCTION 

2025 -2035 THE MOST EXCITING DECADE TO BE ALIVE

The hyopthesis of this article is that AI (the engineering of intelligence) is ready to turn out very well for humanity provided teachers of teenagers chnage every disciline, studnets are celebrated by intelligence to chnage what they action learn communally as well as individually. Spiritually teaching will need to elebrate love trust and opennes not fear, hate and closedness. Technically the way agentic ai becomes learner centric over the next decade may be all or nothing in tranforming educational attenmtion.

CONTENTS

Diagram show 3 field sof intelligence which now interactb woith each other

biotech and health intelligences

autonomous mobile machines - seld-druving carers will be a brerakthrough for varuioous humanoid servants on our streets; when factoiries or otherb  work space sto integrate sufficient autonomous machines it turns out we now have the tech to digitally twin such leaps in human productivity if we trust each other to do so

(we discuss the examploes of digitally twinningt the first sipersomeuters to be 25 times more energy efficient and buildable in 120 days- this may come as quite a surorise: where something is surprising we have asked grok to proggfcheck at the level of teenage analysis0. Beyond the 3 ai fiends we look at more detaikled platforms the most open ai supercomputre of 2026 is likely being pretained around

machines mediating the 5 human senses so that everyone can code provided problem defintion is systematicaly specified- this is a world away from programers being thise who coded binary

In more detaiil we look at 5 by 15 year pero=iods of compounding 10**18n more tech - who humanly prepared what- where did entrepreneurial advances actually connected positve trades between peoples


we [lay a game - which 6 peoploe would you choose all teenage tecahers and students are at least aware of - we deliberatedly choose 6 dimensions of mapping best times to be alive - yoiuur lpcal choice of who is comtributing a relevant alumni network matters

for example one of our 6 diemsions is ppace elader whsoe vision is trusted and insired- we take teh example of how king charles launced data soveigty of ai for folowers of kings english and thos who continue the relay of teh ain world summit which he helped launch nov 2023 like this


We offer this article as a start of a debate not the final word.it odeso draw on 75 years of diaries befinning withb how vone neumann einstein turing briefed journalsits and economists in 1951. unexpectedly all of these 3 genii who birthed tyhe futureb of 10**18 tech died suddenly in mid 1950s without many alumni. This is one reason why even today we are  pkaying eg catchupo wityh most of the 1905 maths transformation einstein published as e=mcsquared

We welcome corepondemnce with people who want to improve this game. The article is intended as a comons property though where we quite from eg grok you may need to take your own responsibility for selective extraction and the date at which this was stamped.


==========================

examples of following up more detailed expoenetial- early into covid jensen hiang (us west coast and taiwan), masa son japan , cambridge uk appear to have been close to emerging one eoverall supercomputer design network; in finacing it fell apart because softbank's portfolio on real space community advances was decimated by covid; noetheless 2024 conversations between these 3 ceos still seem to be motivated by the same intelligence engineering goals


short stories :

Drew endy dadelions now make latex, mushrooms now make haute couture leather sunbbstitute; around the wordl ctalogue of what can make what


jensen haung says he overees eg 50 enginnering projects at any one time - mainly by email - expects some of the cc to be agentic ai soon; also trains some agentic ai to be partos of his own submemory or research- having done this will he eg share them with his fav coleges in taiwan hong kong oregon


what does jensen mean that one dad everyone can program provided they detail a system chalenge in enough detail - far away from 0.1 programming

for decades now people have said if  teh world colaborates on cancer database a lot of prevenmntion modeling will be possible - but who has the incentinve to make possibly biggest health leap ever but one withoit usual monetisation models -if cancer isnt the number 1 inteligence chalenge all nations could unite round - wht is and why is one multilateral forum focused only on definging such big data chalenges - is this what abe meant by osama track; is expo living up to this


WHEN: Today, Thursday, September 14, 2023  

WHERE: CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street”

Following is the unofficial transcript of a CNBC exclusive interview with SoftBank Founder & CEO Masayoshi Son and Arm CEO Rene Haas on “Squawk on the Street” today, Thursday, September 14 to discuss expectations for Arm’s IPO – the biggest IPO of 2023 & more. Following is a link to video on CNBC.com: https://www.cnbc.com/video/2023/09/14/arm-ceo-china-business-reflects-growth-we-see-in-the-rest-of-the-world.html.

PART I

PART I

RENE HAAS: Yeah so, Arm of 2023 returning to the public markets, we’re a very different company than we were in 2016 when we were largely associated, as you said, with mobile. And the important thing to think about Arm or remember is that we were born from building a device that was going to run off of battery. So that sensibility about power efficiency is in the DNA of our engineers. So fast forward to 2023, when you look at the diversification of our markets, cloud data center, automotive, everything with EV and automotive. These require extremely power-efficient processors or CPUs, which is what we do. So whether it’s data center, obviously around sustainability, you want to have as much low power as possible. Again, back on these cars running off batteries, it’s a great place for Arm to really grow our business. And that’s what we did in the years being private between 2016 and now. We diversified our business. We’ve got significant growth in the cloud data center and in automotive. And then with AI, AI runs on Arm. It’s hard to find an AI device today that isn’t Arm-based. Google Alexa – excuse me, Amazon Alexa for example, that device which does voice recognition, etc., that’s AI. And what we see happening going forward is products that didn’t have a CPU to run AI, they’ll need AI. You might need more CPUs to run more complex AI, so we see just huge growth opportunities there.

DAVID FABER: What is running generative AI though, is more GPU and is obviously all produced by Nvidia. There is a relationship there obviously, you once worked for the company as well. But investors I’ve spoken to would like to see a lot deeper relationship. Is it your expectation that you’re going to sell more to Nvidia? Because they’re not that large a customer.

HAAS: So Nvidia today is doing obviously a lot around AI – generative AI and training. Their latest product that they announced the Grace Hopper Superchip, which is their accelerated GPU for AI training, now uses 72 Arm CPUs as the core CPU on that. Remember, no type of accelerated training for AI can run without a CPU. So now the combination of the Arm CPUs with Nvidia GPUs we think will be even more growth opportunity for us going forward.

FABER: But you know, when investors looked at your S-1 for example and or your recent numbers, they didn’t see a great deal of growth year-over-year. And yet you’re pointing to a much more significant growth next year over this year and even after that. Why?

HAAS: The year-on-year growth was not that great, as you said. If we look backwards for the last three years as we’ve pivoted our strategy, we’re about 15% year-on-year growth going forward – excuse me, for the last three years. But going forward again, when you look at these mega trends of efficiency, software, complex AI all having to run off batteries or low power devices, this is huge growth for us. And again, David, Grace Hopper is a great example of the kinds of devices that can only be built on Arm. 

FABER: Masa, it wasn’t that many years ago that you were selling this company to Nvidia or at least had plans to sell this company to Nvidia. That obviously did not happen. The price tag then was 40 billion. A lot of it was made up of Nvidia stock. What has changed between then and now?

MASAYOSHI SON: We did not want to really sell. It was the Covid that made me really, you know, go into the protective mode. So I had to go protective mode and I had to choose the more conservative, careful operation of SoftBank. So that we were selling to Nvidia, but the deal was actually one-third cash, two-thirds was exchange of Nvidia’s share as a combined company of Nvidia and Arm. I believed in the future of Nvidia back then, and it was right. And I believed in the combinations of the power of the two companies would be enormous. I believed in the future of AI. And it’s really now getting proved. And this is the beginning of big AI time and Arm is going to have a big role in that.

PART II

HAAS: Our China business reflects the growth we see in the rest of the world. We’re seeing huge growth in the data center around cloud computing, also with AI, and then EVs. Huge growth in China in terms of EVs. And China wants a lot of what the rest of the world needs: power efficiency, software ecosystem. A lot of the same software that’s used across the world is used in China. So what we’re seeing David, in terms of our China market growing, is largely around those two areas: data center and automotive. Now in terms of the broader issues, I think I share the same headaches that just about every tech CEO does these days. We comply, of course, with all the regulations that come down relative to export control, if there’s something that we need to adhere to, of course. But it’s really it’s a tricky market to figure out just in general because of all the things that are going on geopolitically. But broadly speaking, our China business has been doing very well.

FABER: Yeah, I want to get back to the business itself. But Masa, you know, your – Softbank owns a significant stake in the joint venture that I’m describing in China. You’ve obviously done business there. You were a very large holder of Alibaba for many years. What is your sense in terms of the risk that China poses given the percentage of revenues that it comprises for your company for Arm is quite high?

SON: U.S., China is having a very complicated situation now. The, China has significant impact to the economy of the rest of the world. So I think – I hope the situation get better, but who knows. I just am one of citizen who is wondering and, you know, concerned about the future of China, U.S. and the rest of the world.

FABER: Yeah. What do you hear? I mean, you have had relationships, deep relationships with many people in the business community there. How deep are your concerns? Not just in terms of the back and forth between the U.S. and China, but also in terms of the regime itself and its crackdown, so to speak, on entrepreneurship, if I could call it that.

SON: Well, it’s difficult to comment. Whatever I comment, it goes into all kinds of headlines here and there, so I have to be careful what I say. But our exposure in China, Softbank as a group has reduced significantly. Because now, you know, most of the shares in Alibaba from Softbank is already sold.

PART III

SON: Yeah. We – SoftBank owned 75% of Arm until just a few weeks ago. And just a few weeks ago, we bought back from 75% to 100% from Vision Fund. We pay even higher price. So I’m more confident about the future. I think the value is gonna have a good upside, really long term. And that’s why I bought back with a higher price than $51. And I just want to have all the investors have a good time going forward.

PART IV

SON: Well, Rene has, you know, a great chemistry with me. We share the vision completely together. We’re talking almost every day, we’re chatting with WhatsApp and, you know, calling all the time almost really every day multiple times, like three times, five times, sometimes 10 times a day.

PART V

SON: Yeah, well, I’m a big believer of AI. Since I started SoftBank, I was a big believer of, you know, the microprocessors enabling all kinds of technology, evolution starting with PC, and then mobile, internet, and then now going into AI. It is a front end of all the innovation of our industry. It’s the core is the microprocessor. So Arm is now going to become the core of the AI revolution. My belief of the front end of the IT industry’s evolution is really shifting to AI so my my focus, my belief is all centered in AI and Arm is going to become the core of that. Many of the Vision Fund portfolio companies, we have about 500 companies, they’re going to be, you know, having a lot of great applications of AI and they’re going to be beneficiary of this Arm and many other AI technology players.

FABER: Yeah, well, I mean you recently said or not that long ago, Arm is positioned to benefit from AI becoming the, quote, “The basis for a new society.” What does that mean?

SON: Yes. Well, I think this is the first time that mankind experience something smarter than mankind itself. Right? Mankind was the smartest animal on the earth. The AI is going to surpass and surpass big time. I think the AGI stage is coming very soon. And once it comes, it goes so far away. And it’s a new stage of society, that we all have to ask ourselves, what is mankind? What is job? What is life? What is the intelligence? It’s a new experience completely new society that we are going to face.

FABER: Masa, if you’d been in that meeting with a lot of the leaders in AI that just took place with Senator Schumer and other members of Congress, what would you have shared? I mean, you just said it’s going to exceed our own intelligence. There are those who are quite frightened by that prospect and worried about the dangers of AI. Do you share that?

SON: Well, if we mishandle it, it has a danger like automotive society. It has a danger of the car accident if you, if you don’t regulate. The automotive society is regulated with a traffic light and speed limit and don’t drive with alcohol drinking. So AI society should regulate to protect humankind. However, it has more merit than the demerits. So I think I’m a believer. I’m optimistic that AI is going to solve the issues that mankind couldn’t solve in the past, like difficult disease, the natural disasters, the car accidents, all kinds of other issues that humankind had in the past will be helped by the advancement of AI and technology.

FABER: Rene, you’re going to be in the middle of this. I mean, you know, you’re going to be providing designs that are going to help Nvidia use, create chips that are going to be powering generative AI. Do you feel similarly or are you perhaps more concerned?

HAAS: I agree with Masa from the standpoint that we are going to see some very, very profound advancements around AI going forward. The ChatGPT moment, if you will, I think was a tipping point relative to what the capability of these large language models could do. So on one level as a CEO of a company that builds a lot of devices based on AI and an engineer at heart, phenomenal opportunity. And I think for us going forward back to the CPU being the center of everything and you can’t really run AI without a CPU, it’s going to be a huge growth opportunity for Arm. That said, there are a lot of social and ethical type of things to consider, which I think as a society, we have to figure out and we’re in early days on that.

PART VI

HAAS: I think what’s important to remember again, our core product is the CPU and what is the superpower of the CPU? It’s the broad software ecosystem around it. We have a software ecosystem like no architecture probably ever invented. Every major operating system whether it’s iOS, Android, Windows, Android Linux, Automotive Linux, all the Linux distributions for the cloud, not only do they run on Arm, but they’ve been optimized for years, in some cases decades. RISC-V, as you mentioned, is a new emerging entity. Right now, what we see is that they just don’t have much traction in the area around software ecosystems. It’s not to say that we don’t watch our competition very seriously. We obviously do and there’s a lot of war room discussions about how to address that. But broadly speaking, I think the the hurdle they have to cross is around the software ecosystem. And that is not an easy moat to cross.

FABER: Why not?

HAAS: Just the sheer amount of development time that goes into it. I’ll give you an example. Windows running on Arm PCs. I worked on them personally in my previous life back 2009. Here it is 2023, 14 years later, and we’re just now starting to see growth of Arm on Windows PCs. It just takes time. There’s a lot of software work that needs to be done, development time, and optimizations. And, and that’s just for PCs, when you think about phones, when you think about the cloud and you think about automotive, the software gets more and more complex. So, I think over time, that is something that we’ll continue to invest in and I think it’s a it’s a big path RISC-V to cross.

FABER: Speaking of over time, Masa, you know again, you at SoftBank own 90% of Arm, the now public company. Are you going to sell any of that? It is your expectation that you will be a holder from here on of that 90% stake or is it something that you do see as potentially monetizable over time?

SON: Well, I want to keep it as much as possible as long as possible. I’m a long-term believer and and so on. Of course, you know, if the next Covid comes, who knows? But our intent is to hold as much as possible as long as possible. I wanted to keep 100% of Arm on the reason we are having IPO and selling is because Arm is such an important company for the industry, I wanted to have investors opportunity to participate on the upside opportunity of arm and wanted it to become a public, used to be a public company. So back into public company’s position so that you know people will have more transparency of the operation of the companies and so on and also give the engineers and employees the stock options to realize.

FABER: Right. Rene, you’re now a public company CEO. I mean, you do have one very large shareholder, but does it change how you do your job?

HAAS: Well, you know, as Masa said, he’s a long-term believer in Arm. So making sure I keep my number one shareholder happy is very important. But at the same time, he and I are very aligned on the on the long-term vision and view for the company. I believe we are one of the most foundational companies inside our industry. The world runs on Arm, it’s hard to find an end device that doesn’t run on Arm. And at the same time, I think when we looked at the percentage of the population that uses Arm, it’s probably north of 70%. So while we’re thrilled to be public today and I’m thrilled for all the employees as I said and our partners and developers, I really think that the best is ahead and I’m super excited about the next five to 10 years for the company.

FABER: Is there any scenario in which you would actually start to not just design chips but design your own chips?

HAAS: I don’t want to foreshadow what our product plans might be. But the company is foundational to the electronics industry and we have a lot of opportunity for growth.

FABER: That’s where you’re going to leave it, just that? A lot of opportunity for growth? We’re going to be able to do interviews in the future together. So I guess I’ll be—

HAAS: You can ask me next time. 

FABER: I’ll be able to ask you that again. Let me come back to something as well Rene that a number of investors did at least mention to me as a potential concern, which is this lawsuit against Qualcomm. You know, never great to be suing somebody that you do business with. Can you give us an update in terms of your expectations and, and, and why perhaps people should not be concerned?

HAAS: Qualcomm is a great partner. You know, back to the foundational aspect of what we do, just about every product that Qualcomm puts into the market runs on Arm, their Snapdragon that goes into phones is based on Arm, their forays into PC will be based on Arm, their automotive platforms are all based on Arm so they’re a huge partner for us. We hope that dispute can be settled. I can’t say much about the litigation, it’s headed for courts next year. But I’ll just kind of leave it at that.


more on rene


Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)